• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Eye on I.V. Looks Back

    An Update on the Social Host Ordinance, Fight Night, and Floatopia


    Wednesday, April 22, 2009
    By Nicki Arnold
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Reader, you’ll have to forgive me. I’ve been so busy getting the scoop on various Isla Vista institutions, events, etc., that I haven’t given you an update on things I reported on in the past. Good journalists always give a follow-up story if developments occur, and while I don’t consider what I do here hard-hitting journalism, I do want to bring you up to date on past stories.

    The Social Host Ordinance

    Last time I covered the Social Host Ordinance, it was February 25 and the matter was going to a vote on April 21. It would be awesome if I could tell you it came to vote as scheduled and everything was all sorted out, but we’re dealing with local government here, so let’s be real. The county released a fourth draft just last week, and the ordinance has undergone some major changes since it was first born, both good and bad.

    Nicki Arnold

    The first major positive change — which might matter more to me as a word nerd but is critical nonetheless — is that a few of the definitions were changed. I’m particularly happy that the words “loud or unruly gathering” are no longer present anywhere in the document. They were a bit presumptuous and have been replaced by the more neutral term “party, gathering, or event,” defined as “a group of two or more persons who have assembled or are assembling for a social occasion or a social activity.” Later, the ordinance prohibits “unlawful gatherings,” which explicitly says nobody will host a party, gathering, or event where minors are consuming alcohol. The owner/tenant of the premise is assumed to have allowed or hosted the gathering, which is a public nuisance and punishable with a fine.

    A previous draft had redefined “responsible person” to not include anybody who might be an owner or tenant, but did not know the party was happening. However, now “person” is defined as anybody who owns, rents, leases, or is otherwise in charge of the premises where the event takes place, regardless of whether he or she knew or intended that minors would be drinking. Additionally, this ordinance only looks like it punishes one person, but in I.V., many people are on the same lease and thus equally responsible for the property, and perhaps all “hosted” the party equally; does the county pick one person arbitrarily? The ordinance is forgiving in that it provides an opportunity for the person to attend a counseling or education program, but what if one person on the lease decides he or she wants to do that, but the others don’t or can’t? Is the fine broken down by percentage?

    I should note that not all of these changes are bad. This draft of the ordinance no longer holds landlords responsible, which is great. They likely have nothing to do with a party. They can put no-party clauses in their leases all they want to, but those won’t stop renters here. Tenants know their landlord can’t come and check for a party at their property every night (it becomes an invasion of privacy after a while), so renters figure as long as they clean up before the landlord comes by, all will be okay. This draft also shifts the violation to a responsible person (not property), so there are no longer concerns about one violation happening with one set of tenants in, say, April, and again in November but with a new set of tenants who get charged with a “second violation” because of the April offense. However, offenses are no longer wiped off after a year; a second offense counts as a second offense, no matter if it happened two months after the first or two years.

    This version of the draft is set to go before the Board of Supervisors on May 5, but I’m not holding my breath.

    Fight Night

    In my last column, I ventured into Duke’s boxing for my first foray into the boxing world — and absolutely loved it. Henry Calles, owner and coach extraordinaire, was preparing eight of his boxers for Fight Night, an annual philanthropic boxing event held by the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity. But since then, PIKE has lost its charter with the university as the result of a hate crime that occurred in front of the fraternity’s house. Even though they tried to hand the event over to Pi Alpha Phi (the multicultural fraternity), Fight Night was cancelled, supposedly due to some sort of circumstantial and logistical reasons. To be honest, Fight Night has been under fire from the administration for years — holding an annual boxing event between huge frat guys who are high on adrenaline and inflicting pain on one another doesn’t exactly bode well for the reputation of UCSB — and I think this just gave the administration a reason to shut it down.

    While the “official” Facebook event page for Fight Night says the event has been shifted to May 15, I’m still not so sure the university will let it happen. It’s too bad that the guys who have been training so hard for so many months have nothing now and that the Say Yes to Kids foundation that gets charity money from Fight Night will have to go without the funds this year. However, Fight Night did need a revamp — it’s still a bit too “fratty” for my liking — so maybe this will force future planners to change it up.

    Floatopia

    I’m not going to say much on this because, really, everything there is to say about Floatopia has already been said. We all had a great time. We left behind a lot of trash, which is unforgivably irresponsible. We were way too drunk to be in the ocean. But we like partying too much to keep this event from happening again. Floatopia 2 is set for May 9, and although there have been rumors of ordinances prohibiting alcohol on the beach, it doesn’t look like anything will be different except for tougher and increased law enforcement. My prediction? It will be smaller — by then, those of us on the quarter system will be waist-deep in research papers and midterms, and those on the semester system will be headed into finals — and since we’re actually pretty embarrassed by the atrocious amounts of garbage left behind, there will be a bigger cleanup effort.

    It’s not a mistake if you learn from it, right?

    Related Links

    • Previous Eye on Isla Vista columns
    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Please read UCSB Vice Chancellor Michael Young's letter and join us in an environmental mission.

    http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=75...

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    RodTucknott (anonymous profile)
    April 23, 2009 at 4:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Oh Nicki, I love how you portray the UCSB constituancy. If you perceive being wronged, violated, mistreated or left-out, you claim you are a strong and powerful community that should not be overlooked and the wrath of your actions will right the wrong. As soon as you show your true colors, as irresponsible wet behind the ears children, you slink down in your chair and put on your puppy dog face and say, "We're just kids, and we'll learn from our mistakes".

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    VoiceofSB (anonymous profile)
    April 28, 2009 at 11:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Voice, the problem w/ I.V. is that you get a "1st time away from home" crowd that believes I.V. is a Neverland where laws & repercussion for ill-behavior don't apply.
    I can't tell you how many times I've had some idiot say the following to me after complaining of noise on a weeknight (Sun nite-Thu nite) @ 12:00 or so am (by the way, Sun -Thu nites the noise is supposed to be quelled @ 10:00 pm so I'm being a bit generous here):
    "Dude, chill out, this is I.V. Go live somewhere else if you don't like it!"
    My response to this is simple:
    "Hey, jackass, it may be I.V. alright, but the laws of the county still apply. Don't believe me? Well, let's call the Foot Patrol & we can discuss about it."
    To the "you shouldn't live in I.V." comment:
    So let me guess. If a Black or Latino family moved into your neighborhood back home, you'd probably have a problem w/ that too. The thing is YOU are in MY neighborhood of 20+ yrs. Been here longer, will remain here. If you want to argue about it, let's call the Foot Patrol & we can discuss it further."
    The cool thing about the Foot Patrol is that these newb morons are more worried about having their bongs confiscated by the Foot patrol than standing up for their "right to party" so I always win.
    What many fail to realize is that I.V. (while still unincorporated) is a part of SB county & laws, ordinances & such apply. Some have to learn the hard way.
    I'm going to admit, I did (& still do sometimes) my share of jackass antics. But NEVER did I think/believe that I was above the law or immune from the repercussion of my actions.
    Yet, in all this time I NEVER been arrested or cited for anything. Why? It's called discretion, something never taugh in the homes of the spolied. Humility is another thing that goes hand in hand w/ that & seldom taught.
    Like I've told my neighbors time & again: "Look, I like a good party just as much as the next person, but what some neighbors have to comprehend is that if you live in a house w/ a bunch of other idiots such as yourself, knock yourselves out, have a human sacrifice or 2 while you're @ it, not my problem.
    But what is stupid is the failure to realize you live in an apartment complex & not everybody wants to put up w/ your crap every single night.
    Weekends, cool, worknights no way, 683-2724, that's County Dispatch & who I WILL be calling.
    By the way, there may be more of you than me, but I got my posse called the I.V. Foot Patrol & I GUARANTEE you, they will win EVERY TIME!"
    It all comes down to respect or the lack thereof & I will use the law of reciprocity when dealing w/ lack of respect :) henry

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    hank (anonymous profile)
    April 29, 2009 at 11:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    54.0°
    Wind:
    6 W

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    3. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    4. Nothing to Hide Anymore
    5. Teacher in Trouble
    6. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.