• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

There Will Be Wind

Lompoc Wind Farm Okayed by Planning Commission


Tuesday, September 30, 2008
By Ethan Stewart (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

Looking to zap the county with enough renewable energy to power 50,000 homes a year, Santa Barbara County planning commissioners unanimously greenlighted plans to put a large-scale wind farm in the foothills south of Lompoc. The first of its kind in the county, the project was met warmly by commissioners on Tuesday during a full-day special hearing on the topic.

After debating the project’s merits for nearly eight hours, the commissioners voted not only to certify the wind farm’s Environmental Impact Report (EIR) but also to grant the coveted Conditional Use Permit, without which this unique project would fail. “I am looking at the negative aspects of the project and they are minor in comparison to the positive ones … I absolutely support this,” said 4th District Commissioner Joe Valencia, in whose district much of the project will reside.

In the pipeline since 2006, the wind farm — which aims to spread 65 turbines, each standing approximately 400 feet high on 2,950 acres of private ranch land in and around San Miguelito Canyon — was not without its detractors on Tuesday. While a vast majority of the 37 public speakers supported the plan proposed by international wind energy giant Acciona, several who might soon be living in the shadows of the turbines expressed reservations.

“We will all be visibly impacted by these. [The turbines] are going to be huge,” explained Jane Fassold, who lives on the edge of nearby Mesa Oaks. “I would like to see this get passed down in Santa Barbara or Montecito. It would not work.”

Beside viewshed impacts, other neighbors complained about the noise associated with the turbines—which county staff reported would not exceed, at worst, 50 decibels, or the equivalent of a “very quiet residence”—as well as the FAA-required blinking red lights that would sit atop many of the devices. Their complaints essentially boiled down to a sentiment put forth by neighbor George Bedford: “We are not against the project. We are just against the project affecting our quality of lives.”

While the annual 285 million kilowatt-hours that Acciona hopes to deliver is just what South Coast environmental organizations have been lobbying for, the project was also criticized by groups like the Audubon Society and the Environmental Defense Center for the impact it will have on bird and bat populations. Both groups asked for more stringent precautions and monitoring protocols to would reduce the number of creatures killed by the turbines’ whirling blades.

The terms of the EIR require Acciona to position the turbines to be sensitive to habitat areas and migratory routes, but the fact remains that, according to the EIR, at least 270 birds are known to fly through the area, including four golden eagles. (It should be noted, however, that the major migration route in the area is roughly 20 to 40 miles east of the project site.) “We have very low migratory populations in the area, and low year round populations as well,” said Marie Campbell, who helped conduct nearly 1,000 hours of bird studies for the EIR. “And the birds that we do have are primarily very low to the ground.”

With that in mind, the project features a monitoring program that will run for two years once the first turbine starts spinning. County biologists will survey the surrounding area looking for animal fatalities and will alter turbine sites and hours of operation accordingly. Should the first two years prove to be incident-free, additional mortality studies will be conducted in the sixth and tenth years to ensure that nothing has changed. Also, in a tweak that is the first of its kind in the nation for wind projects, the county’s Planning and Development director has the authority to shut down the wind farm or certain turbines on the wind farm should conditions arise that indicate a large-scale kill-off of birds or bats has occurred or is likely to occur.

Next up for the wind farm is a return to the county’s Board of Architectural Review in the coming weeks.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

Bye bye birdies...

AShaw (anonymous profile)
October 1, 2008 at 1:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)

This represents a huge step for alternative energy and eventual independence from foreign oil (upsides). Of course there is a downside (view impediments for a few and some (hopefully few) dead birds). Everything has an upside and a downside. Perhaps the EDC and their ilk could start suggesting alternatives that would work in the real world and that they would support, instead of simply disagreeing with everything.

RCMeltzer (anonymous profile)
October 1, 2008 at 5:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

According to the EIR, the project site has the lowest bird and bat usage of any wind farm project in California. Bird fatalities caused by wind turbines are less than one in 10,000 fatalities. Buildings and windows are tthe most significant cause of bird fatalities, while wind turbines are the lowest.

I am glad that this project was approved. It's interesting though: everybody wants alternative energy - just not in their own backyard...

CommonSense (anonymous profile)
October 1, 2008 at 9:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Yeah suddenly dead birds and environmental visual blight are no biggie to the greenies, because of the word "alternative" and because "Bush and his oil cronies" can't profit from it - but watch 'em scream when one oil refinery goes up or one bird gets covered with tar on the beach...the hypocrisy is always astounding, but predictable.

AShaw (anonymous profile)
October 1, 2008 at 12:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)

If "the EDC and their ilk could start suggesting alternatives that would work in the real world and that they would support, instead of simply disagreeing with everything." they would no longer have a source of income. Do you actually think they exist because of a genuine heart felt concern for the environment? Green money is big money in Santa Barbara.

AShaw (anonymous profile)
October 1, 2008 at 12:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)

AShaw wrote: "Yeah suddenly dead birds and environmental visual blight are no biggie to the greenies, because of the word "alternative" and because "Bush and his oil cronies" can't profit from it - but watch 'em scream when one oil refinery goes up or one bird gets covered with tar on the beach...the hypocrisy is always astounding, but predictable"

I believe you are the hypocrit. An environmental study was done and you don't like the outcome because it doesn't fit in you small world view? Why does everything always needs to be political in this country? This is a suggestion that works in the real world and so what if some people make money on it - that is the real world. I have been a Greenie for over 20 years back in Europe and I am just glad that something is finally being done. And if someone makes money on it I don't care, because I care for the environment!! And trust me I care for the birds too.

CommonSense (anonymous profile)
October 1, 2008 at 3:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Where did I say I didn't like the outcome? I'm happy for any energy including drilling. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of those that are anti-oil and pro wind, and that think this is going to be a substitute. Oil works in the real world as well and so what if people make money on it. In both cases every attempt is made to reduce wildlife impact, but there has to be a reasonable risk and sacrifice.

AShaw (anonymous profile)
October 1, 2008 at 4:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Just to clarify: EDC did, and always has supported the Lompoc Wind Energy project. We actively support developing alternatives to carbon based fuels. Assuring the future success of alternative energy projects requires reducing incidental and avoidable damage to the surrounding environment however. We worked with the Applicant and the County to devise conditions that will protect native wildlife, including eagles, kites, owls and hawks. These conditions do not threaten the project, but make it a better one. The Planning Commission agreed, and added appropriate conditions to its approval. This was a win-win situation - and we are proud of our role.

DavidLandecker (anonymous profile)
October 2, 2008 at 10:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)

It might help, David, if you were more specific about exactly what conditions were devised to protect wildlife. It's a rather general statement to say that you "worked with the Applicant". Working with someone does not necessarily produce results. Thanks for participating in the discussion.

AShaw (anonymous profile)
October 2, 2008 at 11:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)

*crickets*

AShaw (anonymous profile)
October 4, 2008 at 10:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Haze
Temperature:
61.0°
Wind:
7 SW

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Coverage
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Tea Fire 2008
  • Local Heroes 2008
  • Chamomile Café
  • Reprieve for Modoc Road Evictees
  • Which Canyon Will Burn Next?
  • Zach Gill’s Timely Tidings
  • Thanksgiving Turkey
  1. Saving the Riviera
  2. Obituary for Susan Lake
  3. Hannah-Beth Jackson Concedes to Tony Strickland
  4. From Black Friday to Blessed Friday
  5. Green Building Techniques Save Home on Mountain Drive
  6. Embers to Ashes
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.