• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    There Will Be Wind

    Lompoc Wind Farm Okayed by Planning Commission


    Tuesday, September 30, 2008
    By Ethan Stewart (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Looking to zap the county with enough renewable energy to power 50,000 homes a year, Santa Barbara County planning commissioners unanimously greenlighted plans to put a large-scale wind farm in the foothills south of Lompoc. The first of its kind in the county, the project was met warmly by commissioners on Tuesday during a full-day special hearing on the topic.

    After debating the project’s merits for nearly eight hours, the commissioners voted not only to certify the wind farm’s Environmental Impact Report (EIR) but also to grant the coveted Conditional Use Permit, without which this unique project would fail. “I am looking at the negative aspects of the project and they are minor in comparison to the positive ones … I absolutely support this,” said 4th District Commissioner Joe Valencia, in whose district much of the project will reside.

    In the pipeline since 2006, the wind farm — which aims to spread 65 turbines, each standing approximately 400 feet high on 2,950 acres of private ranch land in and around San Miguelito Canyon — was not without its detractors on Tuesday. While a vast majority of the 37 public speakers supported the plan proposed by international wind energy giant Acciona, several who might soon be living in the shadows of the turbines expressed reservations.

    “We will all be visibly impacted by these. [The turbines] are going to be huge,” explained Jane Fassold, who lives on the edge of nearby Mesa Oaks. “I would like to see this get passed down in Santa Barbara or Montecito. It would not work.”

    Beside viewshed impacts, other neighbors complained about the noise associated with the turbines—which county staff reported would not exceed, at worst, 50 decibels, or the equivalent of a “very quiet residence”—as well as the FAA-required blinking red lights that would sit atop many of the devices. Their complaints essentially boiled down to a sentiment put forth by neighbor George Bedford: “We are not against the project. We are just against the project affecting our quality of lives.”

    While the annual 285 million kilowatt-hours that Acciona hopes to deliver is just what South Coast environmental organizations have been lobbying for, the project was also criticized by groups like the Audubon Society and the Environmental Defense Center for the impact it will have on bird and bat populations. Both groups asked for more stringent precautions and monitoring protocols to would reduce the number of creatures killed by the turbines’ whirling blades.

    The terms of the EIR require Acciona to position the turbines to be sensitive to habitat areas and migratory routes, but the fact remains that, according to the EIR, at least 270 birds are known to fly through the area, including four golden eagles. (It should be noted, however, that the major migration route in the area is roughly 20 to 40 miles east of the project site.) “We have very low migratory populations in the area, and low year round populations as well,” said Marie Campbell, who helped conduct nearly 1,000 hours of bird studies for the EIR. “And the birds that we do have are primarily very low to the ground.”

    With that in mind, the project features a monitoring program that will run for two years once the first turbine starts spinning. County biologists will survey the surrounding area looking for animal fatalities and will alter turbine sites and hours of operation accordingly. Should the first two years prove to be incident-free, additional mortality studies will be conducted in the sixth and tenth years to ensure that nothing has changed. Also, in a tweak that is the first of its kind in the nation for wind projects, the county’s Planning and Development director has the authority to shut down the wind farm or certain turbines on the wind farm should conditions arise that indicate a large-scale kill-off of birds or bats has occurred or is likely to occur.

    Next up for the wind farm is a return to the county’s Board of Architectural Review in the coming weeks.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    This represents a huge step for alternative energy and eventual independence from foreign oil (upsides). Of course there is a downside (view impediments for a few and some (hopefully few) dead birds). Everything has an upside and a downside. Perhaps the EDC and their ilk could start suggesting alternatives that would work in the real world and that they would support, instead of simply disagreeing with everything.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    RCMeltzer (anonymous profile)
    October 1, 2008 at 5:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    According to the EIR, the project site has the lowest bird and bat usage of any wind farm project in California. Bird fatalities caused by wind turbines are less than one in 10,000 fatalities. Buildings and windows are tthe most significant cause of bird fatalities, while wind turbines are the lowest.

    I am glad that this project was approved. It's interesting though: everybody wants alternative energy - just not in their own backyard...

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    CommonSense (anonymous profile)
    October 1, 2008 at 9:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    AShaw wrote: "Yeah suddenly dead birds and environmental visual blight are no biggie to the greenies, because of the word "alternative" and because "Bush and his oil cronies" can't profit from it - but watch 'em scream when one oil refinery goes up or one bird gets covered with tar on the beach...the hypocrisy is always astounding, but predictable"

    I believe you are the hypocrit. An environmental study was done and you don't like the outcome because it doesn't fit in you small world view? Why does everything always needs to be political in this country? This is a suggestion that works in the real world and so what if some people make money on it - that is the real world. I have been a Greenie for over 20 years back in Europe and I am just glad that something is finally being done. And if someone makes money on it I don't care, because I care for the environment!! And trust me I care for the birds too.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    CommonSense (anonymous profile)
    October 1, 2008 at 3:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Just to clarify: EDC did, and always has supported the Lompoc Wind Energy project. We actively support developing alternatives to carbon based fuels. Assuring the future success of alternative energy projects requires reducing incidental and avoidable damage to the surrounding environment however. We worked with the Applicant and the County to devise conditions that will protect native wildlife, including eagles, kites, owls and hawks. These conditions do not threaten the project, but make it a better one. The Planning Commission agreed, and added appropriate conditions to its approval. This was a win-win situation - and we are proud of our role.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    DavidLandecker (anonymous profile)
    October 2, 2008 at 10:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Few Clouds
    Temperature:
    48.0°
    Wind:
    5 NE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • Within the Syuxtun Story Circle
    • Camellia Sasanqua
    • Whole New Ballgame
    • Gratuitous Gore on Highway 154
    • Saul Williams Brings Afro-Punk Tour to Velvet Jones
    • Where There’s a Dill, There’s a Way
    1. Travis Armstrong Is Outta There
    2. S.B. Bank & Trust's Rocky Year
    3. UC Campuses Dominate Rankings
    4. What buildings did architect Julia Morgan design in Santa Barbara?
    5. Rattlesnake and San Roque Side of Jesusita Trails to Re-Open Friday
    6. Sexile
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.