• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

Paul Wellman

Bruce Nelson, accused of sexually assaulting two brain-injured patients at Solutions Rehabilitation Center while he worked there, listened to one of his accusers in court Tuesday and will have his other accuser face him today.


Nelson Sexual Assault Trial

Accuser Testifies Against Former Rehab Manager


Thursday, March 13, 2008
By Chris Meagher (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

Jurors in the trial of accused sexual assailant Bruce Nelson heard emotional and explicit testimony on Tuesday when one of the alleged victims took the stand. Nelson, a 56-year-old former high school basketball coach and former night manager at Solutions Rehabilitation Center, is accused of sexually assaulting two women who were patients at the center in 2007.

One accuser, a 22-year-old former UCLA student, recounted five separate occasions while she was at the center, which primarily serves patients who have suffered brain trauma and injury, in which Nelson allegedly committed sexual acts that she said she neither wanted nor invited, including using his tongue to kiss her, inserting his fingers into her vagina, touching her breasts, forcing her to touch his penis, and attempting to have intercourse with her. When she looked around Superior Court Judge Frank Ochoa’s courtroom — particularly at Nelson— she smiled, a seemingly odd gesture considering the circumstances. When prosecutor Joyce Dudley asked the woman about her expression, she said she smiled not because she was happy, but because she was scared.

The woman had to be helped from her wheelchair to the witness stand by her mother, and used a special microphone to be heard. Like the second alleged victim in the case, a 43-year-old woman who is expected to testify today, the 22-year-old damaged her brain after an apparent attempt at suicide. She went into cardiac arrest after overdosing on medication, and the lack of oxygen to her brain during a weeklong coma in February 2007 led to permanent damage.

In his opening statement, defense attorney Steve Balash characterized the woman, Jane Doe #1, as continually improving from her injury and as having consented to the actions. Nelson “admits to having consensual sexual contact” with Doe #1 while at Solutions, Balash said, noting, “There was inappropriate conduct [for an employee of Solutions], but certainly not to the level of charges.” He also cited a doctor’s examination in which the doctor said Doe #1 becomes confused about relationships with different people, especially those who show her attention. During her time at Solutions, the woman wasn’t confined to the center, and Balash attempted to prove that her physical and cognitive skills were not far from normal.

In her testimony, the woman said that, while most of the alleged sexual activity made her feel “gross” or “bad,” some of it felt good, even though she testified she didn’t want him to do it. The woman, who answered questions from Dudley and Balash mostly with short, one-word answers, said she didn’t speak of the incidents until the day before her discharge because Nelson was mostly a nice person whom she didn’t want to get in trouble.

The very person who was paid to protect the two women, Dudley said in her opening statement, not only didn’t do that, but hurt them. “The evidence will show the defendant preyed upon and sexually assaulted two of the most vulnerable” types of people, Dudley said.

Nelson, whose five-year stint at Solutions ended following the allegations in 2007, is a staple in the Santa Barbara basketball community, having served as head coach of the Dos Pueblos High boy’s team for the 1994-95 and 1995-96 seasons and as an assistant for the boy’s basketball team the past two seasons at Santa Barbara High, where his son Roberto is a standout basketball player.

The trial is expected to last through the end of the week. It is not known whether Nelson, who is black, will testify in his defense. Ochoa issued a gag order after Tuesday’s proceedings, meaning neither attorney could comment on the case. Perhaps dragged out because Nelson is facing life in prison, jury selection took six days and four jury panels — roughly 200 people — for the attorneys and Ochoa to come up with a 12-person jury and two alternates. The jury is made up of eight women and four men, none of whom are black.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

What possible excuse do you have for inserting the information that Nelson is black????? What bearing does that have on the case? If he was white, would you have said "Nelson, who is white" ??..... Inexcusable!

jread53 (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2008 at 11:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)

jread,

To answer your question. No, they would not have noted his race if he had been white.

DarNel (anonymous profile)
March 13, 2008 at 11:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Before too many people respond to this point about the mention of Nelson's race, I want to explain why this was included as part of the story. The facts are that Nelson is black and none of the jury is. Attorneys in Santa Barbara in the past have filed motions—and won—challenging the Superior Court jury system and the lack of diversity on a jury.

The race of the jury and the race of the defendant should have been lumped together in the story rather than separated. If the defendant was white and the jury was composed of all non-white members, this would've been significant and included as well.

Chris (Chris Meagher)
March 13, 2008 at 1:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)

In response to Chris' explanation- Those facts should not have been included, separately or otherwise, unless you stated why you, or anyone else, might have thought it was important. Without placing it in context (How many challenges have been made? In what cases? Is the defense concerned? How about the prosecution?) we have no insight in to how or why you are spinning this story the way you are.

jread53 (anonymous profile)
March 14, 2008 at 3:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Broken Clouds
Temperature:
62.1°
Wind:
6 SE

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Info
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Zaca Fire 2007
  • UCSB Students Connect with Veterans and Others Touched by the Horrors of War
  • Cory Cordero-Rabe’s Sound Lab Brings a Community - Based Studio to S.B.
  • Goleta Tax Won’t Endanger Measure A
  • Let the Dog Days Begin
  • New Hires and New Roles at SBMA, the Arts Fund, Westmont, and UCSB
  • Brooks Institute’s Mariah Tauger Is Taking Her Camera to Beijing
  1. Early Morning Gap Fire Update
  2. Gap Fire Reaches Critical Stage
  3. Gap Fire Morning Outlook
  4. Gap Fire Intensifies
  5. Gap Fire Map Online
  6. Update From Friday Afternoon Gap Fire Press Conference
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.