• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

Making Prop. 36 Cuts Sting Slightly Less Painfully

Jail Diversion Participants Contemplate Budget Cut Strategies


Thursday, June 5, 2008
By Nick Welsh (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

After an intense five-hour meeting Monday afternoon, members of Theraputic Justice System’s policy council hammered out a fragile peace over how best to share the pain associated with a $1 million cut to Prop. 36-funded programs designed to divert non-violent substance abusers from jail to treatment. In response to these cuts, the length of treatment provided will be reduced from 18 months to 12. Some service providers worry this reduction in time diminishes the effectiveness of the treatment. They also worry that the number of people likely to benefit will drop from 600 a year to 400. Supporters of this approach counter that the treatment reductions are necessary to prevent waiting lists from becoming a reality. Initially, it appeared that the non-profit agencies providing recovery services would bear the entire brunt of the cuts. But as of Monday, the two judges on the council agreed to assume $12,000 in reductions, and the department of Alcohol Drugs and Mental Health agreed to absorb a $70,000 hit. The non-profits will still assume the lion’s share of pain, but it will be $64,000 less pain.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Mist
Temperature:
63.0°
Wind:
5 WSW

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Coverage
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Zaca Fire 2007
  • How a Group of Ex-Catholic Nuns Saved Their Famous Montecito Retreat Center
  • What Dems Are Doing in Denver While Republicans Ready for St. Paul
  • Santa Barbara Eyes Black Gold
  • Assessing Nuclear Dangers 63 Years Later
  • Santa Barbara’s Studio Artists Open Their Doors
  • Starting Your Cool Season Garden
  1. The Rockstar Who Would Save the World
  2. UCSB, Westmont Make List of Top Colleges
  3. Federal Cannabis Patient to Lead Medical Marijuana March
  4. Naples Dream Development Becoming Reality?
  5. Rogers Brings Home the Gold
  6. Starting Your Cool Season Garden
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.