The fire-scorched ground had barely cooled enough to walk on when I headed down off West Camino Cielo for a first-hand look at the impacts from the Gap Fire. Given the acreage being chewed up by fires elsewhere in California, a 9,400-acre fire doesn't sound like much — except when it's on steep mountainsides immediately above where you live. Then it becomes a really big deal.
With wet weather just a few months away, the reality is a stark one. Because the Gap Fire spread laterally, there are a handful of canyons — Eagle, Tecolote, Ellwood, McCoy, Bartlett, San Pedro, and San Jose — that can funnel ash, loose dirt, rocks, burned brush, and other materials down from the mountains into the ranchlands and, if the rainfall is ample enough, all the way to town. While many won't remember the huge piles of deadwood clogging each of the Carpinteria area bridges on Highway 101 and the miles of mud-filled freeway after the 1971 Romero Fire, the potential for such damage this winter is real.
My first entry into the post-fire wilderness above Goleta is with two friends, Otis and Ron, who, like me, are curious how much burned and how far we can really go. Near the crest, much of the brush is still in place, a curious twist given that the fire started not too far from here. The reason is simple: For most of the Gap Fire, gentle sundowner winds kept the fire from reaching the crest, save for the few places where firefighters had to stop it from jumping the road.
We head downhill along the firefighters' initial attack line and, within a few hundred yards, the live brush gives way to big patches of black hillside. A few hundred more yards bring us to a swatch of sandstone boulders ranging from 10 to 15 feet in height. With the exception of larger oaks and a few other trees sheltered by the rocks, everything has burned, so navigating through the charred maze is relatively easy. Otis follows Ron down through a series of channels that take us further down the hill and I follow. Almost as quickly as we enter, we exit into what looks like open territory, soon realizing everything that could be consumed by the fire was.
Ray Ford
Otis and Ron work their way along a steep section of ridge line below Lizard;'s Mouth.
All three of us are stunned, both by the beauty of the rock-strewn hillsides and the extent of the burn. From town, there is just enough haze to hide the extent of the damage, and from the crest, most of it is hidden from view by the chaparral. But here in the middle, everything except for a few deep canyons and wind-sheltered hillsides has burned.
The ash is deep, 6 to 8 inches in places. What's left of the manzanita, chamise, and ceanothus are fields of blackened skeletons. We work our way west from The Playground to a point where we look directly down into the Ellwood drainage. We've gone more than two miles at this point and 90 percent of what we've traversed is ash and sticks, thousands of acres with almost nothing to hold the hillsides together when the rains do come. But even before that, we'll be paying a heavy price when the fall sundowners descend: With tons of burned material covering the mountains, last year's ash storms will more than likely seem like nothing.
Of biggest concern, however, is that much of the area burned is on U.S. Forest Service land, but almost all of the impacts will be to the ranchers and watersheds down below. And with such steep terrain and a lack of potential spots to slow down the sediment flow, any storm-powered mud slides may prove impossible to stop before it inundates the foothill canyons below.
Working on possible solutions to that is the Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) team, the group routinely assembled by the Forest Service after wildfires to assess watershed damaged that has been meeting for the past several days. Composed of soil scientists, hydrologists, geologists, and other resource specialists, their goal is to recommend treatments that will help mitigate issues relating to flooding, debris flow, and sedimentation. Normally, the BAER work is cause for optimism. But in the case of the Gap Fire, what can be done on Forest Service lands is uncertain at best.
"The terrain is definitely a limiting factor," said BAER team leader Liz Schnackenberg, who explained that about half of the burn was on federal Forest Service land and half on private land. "We can only recommend treatments on the forest part of the burn area, and most of this presents a major challenge." For the private side, Schnackenberg said they are working with other agencies, such as the Natural Resources Conservation Service, "to see what can be done to protect the private lands."
In the meantime, stay tuned to independent.com to see when the BAER recommendations are made public.
411
To see Ray Ford's photos of the burned areas, go to Gap Burn Photos. For more outdoor coverage — including trails, beach walks, and bike rides — see Indy Outdoors.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This



Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
Thanks Ray for another great up-to-date article.
I am GR...("...catch me if you can, says the GingeRbread-man...)
and I would like to apoligize to anyone who might have felt 'offended' by some of my recent comments related to non-Gap fire articles. I hope those comments do not take away any value or readership of the truly high-quality articles offered to us by INDY. Again -sorry to those who I might have offended.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
GoletaResident (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2008 at 12:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Ray - many Wildlandfirefighters refer to 'historic' reasons of why CA is burning these years; do you have any additional insight to offer to us about that? It would really be appreciated to help us understand.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
GoletaResident (anonymous profile)
August 2, 2008 at 1:05 p.m. (Suggest removal)
GR, there are two prime reasons for the uptick in California fires. Historically we the more we suppress wild land fires the older the brush gets. Older brush is composed of lots of dead wood which is far more flammable than younger brush. So older brush burns hotter and is harder to put out.
But there is a new element at play. Global Climate Change caused by our dumping of huge amounts of C02 and other warming gases into the atmosphere is causing the climate zones to shift towards the poles. In California that means that the Sonoran Desert of Mexico is moving north into California. Northern California gets Southern California's climate. Southern California gets Northern Mexico's climate etc. That is an overly simplistic take but in general accurate. Expect more and bigger fires until what grows reflects the new climate. Deserts don't usually burn.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
gaviotamilitia (anonymous profile)
August 4, 2008 at 10:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Responding to the previous post, while greater amounts of dead plant material can increase flammability, there are some misconceptions about chaparral fires, as opposed to forested systems. Studies of historical fire in the Californian chaparral region show that there has been no increase in fire intensity nor in the amount of area burned annually, and there has been no effect of 'suppression' on either of these factors. In coniferous forests suppression may have had a role in increasing understory vegetation volume and has resulted in higher intensity wildfires due to crown burning (but historic clear-cutting has also played a role in promoting dog-hair forests), but this is not the case in chaparral vegetation. Fire intensity has been shown not to increase with chaparral age, and whether it's 8 years old or 80, it will burn essentially in the same manner during 'fire weather'.
Thus, prescribed burning, which many accept on faith is needed to reduce fire risk, in reality does little or nothing to protect us from wildfire (as Ray Ford pointed out in a previous article based on discussions with fire scientists like Jon Keeley). Furthermore, efforts to create so-called fuelbreaks are largely ineffectual, as the serious fires readily send embers far beyond the edges of these strips, creating spot fires several hundred meters away. And these bulldozed areas can even increase, rather than decrease, wildfire risk because they often fill with invasive weeds that ignite far more readily than does native chaparral vegetation. Nearly all wildfires in southern California are human-caused, and nearly all start in the weedy/grassy areas that invade land that's been cleared for various purposes. Using bulldozers, masticators, and other methods to create these erosion-prone weed patches squanders our tax dollars far more than they provide any protection from fire. We really should manage our surrrounding environment based on science, rather than hearsay.
Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0
tdudley (anonymous profile)
August 6, 2008 at 1:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post a comment