• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    New Goleta Water Board Starts Off With a Spat

    Conflicts Arise over Public Documents and Health Insurance


    Wednesday, December 17, 2008
    By Ben Preston (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!
    Bert Bertrando
    Click to enlarge photo

    Paul Wellman

    Bert Bertrando

    Welcoming its newest directors—Lauren Hanson, Bill Rosen, and former board member Larry Mills—the Goleta Water Board held officer elections on December 16, electing, in two unanimous votes, Director Bert Bertrando as president of the board, and Hanson as vice president. While the last board gained a reputation for often tumultuous board meetings, the new board began its first session in an apparent spirit of cooperation. Jack Ruskey, a district customer known for his vocal opposition to the board’s policies and procedures, appeared to be placated by the new board’s first action, stating that he would remain silent, as his concerns about the role of special committees had already been addressed by directors Bertrando and Rosen.

    The silence was short-lived, however, as the issue of legal fees was brought up in the general counsel’s report. Ruskey was named explicitly in the report, water district attorney Chip Wulbrandt asserting that a sizeable expense in the legal fees had been incurred by Ruskey’s frequent, specific, and expansive record requests. Ruskey countered by charging that Wulbrandt had rolled “self litigation,” from an alleged conflict of interest case, into Wullbrandt’s fees to the district, an accusation Wulbrandt denied.

    Bill Rosen
    Click to enlarge photo

    Paul Wellman

    Bill Rosen

    Ultimately, Rosen suggested a two-pronged approach for dealing with public records requests, in which the district would make clear what kinds of records are available for the public, as well as making those records more accessible for easy access.

    The issue of health coverage for board members was also raised. Although most of the district’s directors have elected not to have coverage, one director in the past incurred an annual cost of $11,000 for health insurance premiums, an amount that several members of the public objected to. “There are no other special districts that provide health insurance for board members,” said district customer Craig Geier. Other customers who spoke at the meeting suggested that serving as a board member is a civic duty, and argued that receiving health insurance coverage is not the best use of the district’s resources in the present economic climate.

    These and other issues were tabled for a special board meeting scheduled for Friday, December 19, at 2 p.m.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Not true that no other district directors receive health benefits. To the contrary, ALL water agency directors in San Diego County recieve health, dental, vision at a minimum. Others also get PERS, district provided vehicles for certain "official business", PDA's and/or cell phones and PC's. They complain it's not enough!! So, you people out there in Goleta, be thankful. These directors "make" $20,000/yr plus benefits that double that. That's $40,000 each or a budget item of $200,000 that we have to pay for the luxury to have water. Goleta directors are pussycats compared to San Diego County directors!!

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    Waterman (anonymous profile)
    December 18, 2008 at 8:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    54.0°
    Wind:
    6 W

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    3. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    4. Nothing to Hide Anymore
    5. Teacher in Trouble
    6. Gardens of Rare Books
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.