• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Paul Wellman (file)

    Santa Barbara Eyes Black Gold

    Supes Ask Arnold to Lift Offshore Oil Ban


    Originally published 12:18 a.m., August 27, 2008
    Updated 2:00 p.m., August 27, 2008
    By Ethan Stewart (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    With dollar signs in their eyes and soaring gas prices pummeling them at the pumps, the Santa Barbara County supervisors put an undeniable pockmark on the county’s celebrated environmental legacy this week, urging Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to lift the state’s longstanding ban on new offshore oil leases. After enduring a nearly nine-hour hearing on the subject, complete with 85 public speakers and an exhaustive presentation by county staff, the board voted 3-2 — with the victory delivered by a North County majority — in favor of a letter aimed at softening the governor’s stance on both state and federal offshore oil moratoriums in the name of fiscal and, surprisingly, environmental prudence.

    Click to enlarge photo

    Paul Wellman (file)

    In a move of defiance foreshadowed by their outspoken criticism of the letter approved by their own board, supervisors Janet Wolf and Salud Carbajal drafted a letter of their own in the aftermath of Tuesday’s hearing, telling Schwarzenegger, among other things, “We strongly disagree with the premise and conclusions of that letter and we are concerned [about the] extensive misinformation contained in that letter. … We look forward to working with you and our partners at the state and local level to maintain the moratoria.”

    Though largely symbolic, as the supervisors have no real authority in approving new offshore drilling activity, the vote — which comes nearly 40 years after Union Oil’s Platform A hemorrhaged more than one million gallons of crude oil into the Santa Barbara Channel — marks a historic shift in a county that not only hangs its hat on being the birthplace of the modern environmental movement but also, as recently as just last year, has repeatedly taken an unflinching stand against new offshore oil exploration. “For us to send this letter flies in the face of reason and flies in the face of what I believe our community wants and stands for,” said a visibly emotional 2nd District Supervisor Wolf, mere moments before the fateful votes were cast.

    Photo Gallery

    1969 Oil Spill

    Enlarge photos | View thumbnails

    The action began innocently enough on Tuesday with County Energy Division’s Doug Anthony giving an informed presentation on the current state of energy, effectively painting a picture of a marketplace where domestic demand exceeds current domestic product. Anthony covered everything from the global perspective right down to the specifics of Santa Barbara County oil operators and the future prospective of alternative energies in the area, such as wind, solar, and wave.

    Most enticing, though, to the majority of the board was Anthony’s testimony that, according to folks from the federal Minerals Management Service and the California State Lands Commission, there are an estimated 5.74 billion barrels of crude and 10 trillion cubic feet of natural gas lying untapped beneath the ocean’s floor in the area covered by the federal moratorium from San Louis Obispo County south to Mexico, with an additional 761 million barrels of oil and 189 billion cubic feet of natural gas in the areas immediately offshore of Santa Barbara that are currently under the jurisdiction of the state ban. And while the county currently makes about $5.5 million a year in oil-related revenue from both onshore and offshore operations, the belief is that, should the moratorium be lifted, the cash-strapped county could stand to make tens of millions more.

    Brooks Firestone
    Click to enlarge photo

    Paul Wellman (file)

    Brooks Firestone

    Adding further impetus to the supes’ desire to reopen oil exploration off the coast of Santa Barbara is the belief, trumpeted primarily by 3rd District Supervisor Brooks Firestone, that a national emergency will make the federal government come looking for our untapped oil resources. “Regardless of what our views are, if there is a national emergency for fuel, the considerations of Santa Barbara are liable to be lost,” said Firestone. “Not only do we not have enough money to do the things we want … but we need to do this on our own terms, in a way that we control [in order to preempt an emergency extraction].”

    Furthermore, in a line of argument that took up a bulk of Tuesday’s debate, Firestone and his fellow oil supporters contended that additional oil harvesting in the Santa Barbara Channel would actually help the environment by decreasing the natural oil seeps that have long plagued local waters and area beaches. Ironically, the UCSB research used to back up this claim — done by Dr. Bruce Luyendyk at the Coal Oil Point reserve beneath Platform Hondo — was effectively discredited by Luyendyk himself Tuesday when he testified that such conclusions drawn from his work were “unjustified and unwarranted extrapolations.” That being said, the letter approved this week dedicates an entire paragraph to the seepage issue as being a motivating factor in undoing the bans.

    Click to enlarge photo

    Paul Wellman (file)

    Less than convinced by the promise of money, the possibility of cheaper prices at the pump, or the likelihood of a federal raid on our fossil fuel reserves, Santa Barbara’s environmental community turned out en masse on Tuesday to speak against lifting the moratoriums. Organizations like the Environmental Defense Center (EDC), Get Oil Out (GOO), and the Community Environmental Council (CEC) — all of which were formed in the immediate wake of the 1969 Unocal spill — urged the supervisors to hold the anti-drilling line despite mounting industry and partisan pressures. “The problem is not that oil is too expensive,” explained GOO president John Abraham Powell, “the problem is that we are addicted to oil. Everybody knows that when a junkie needs a fix, they are dangerous and don’t make good decisions.”

    Tam Hunt
    Click to enlarge photo

    Paul Wellman (file)

    Tam Hunt

    Many others reminded the supervisors of many devastating oil spills in the county both onshore and off in the years since 1969 — including the accident off Vandenberg in the late 1990s, Exxon’s flagrant PCB release off Platform Hondo, and, most recently, the rash of mishaps by Greka Energy. Others, including CEC Energy Specialist Tam Hunt, pointed to a report from the U.S. Energy Department that claims that lifting the moratoriums today still wouldn’t affect the marketplace for 20-plus years. “We have a huge problem on our hands,” said Hunt of the current energy crisis, “but new drilling is not part of the solution. … It [the amount of oil available offshore] is a drop in the bucket, if that.”

    For most of those opposed, the idea of more drilling is nothing but a politically motivated roadblock on the way to emerging alternative energy sources. As EDC Chief Counsel Linda Krop put it, “Think where we would be today if we had started looking at this 30 years ago when we had our oil crisis in the 1970s. If we had started moving away from oil then, think where we would be today.”

    In the end, the pleas of the enviros and even other elected officials like Congressmember Lois Capps, Senator Barbara Boxer, State Assemblymember Pedro Nava, and Santa Barbara City Council members Helene Schneider and Das Williams fell on deaf ears with the majority of the supervisors.

    But for the minority, the pleas were not only heard but actually picked up and carried forward, echoing Santa Barbara’s scarred though very much intact environmental legacy all the way to the governor’s office, in the form of Wolf and Carbajal’s letter of defiance.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    Although it was troubling reading about this unfortunate vote here and in other places like the Wall Street Journal and the NY Times and the spin placed on it, the "historic shift" for those of us who live here is that Firestone is gone and his crony Smyser couldn't even make the runoff, good riddance! Local politics does matter and this vote and others particularly recently make it clear how important it is to our future and that of our children, that Firestone and Smyser and any others with their type of thinking have no place on the Board in that future. I don't expect Farr to face any real challenge from Pappas and then it will be vitally important to our quality of life and our childrens' futures that Farr has a long and successful tenure at the Board. This vote meant nothing practically but it shows how close we have come to losing what is vitally important to all of us who grew up here and hope our children stay and prosper and have the same quality of life we have been blessed with. Fortuantely Firestone is out to pasture and we on the South Coast must be dilligent to make sure that all future 3rd District Supervisors represent their constituents who live in Goleta, and those in the Valley who care about our environment and the natural quality of life!

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 3 of 5 • Thumbs Down: 2 of 5

    sbreader (anonymous profile)
    August 27, 2008 at 8:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Is the Indy having yet more copyediting trouble??

    I reside in Santa Barbara and so do thousands of others and we are not eying Black Gold. We want to get oil out or at least fade it away to go fossil free by thirty-nine.

    The headline here should be: Two Lame Duck Republican County Supervisors Repay Some Favors and Ignore the Facts about Black Gold.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 4 • Thumbs Down: 4 of 4

    David_Pritchett (David Pritchett)
    August 27, 2008 at 10:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Once again, the ever-crabby Dave-the-Pritch chooses to take a swipe at the Independent for not embracing and following his unassailable news instincts.

    I'm sure if the newspaper wanted your "help," David_Pritchett, they would have asked long ago. But I wouldn't wait for the phone to ring.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 3 of 5 • Thumbs Down: 2 of 5

    binky (anonymous profile)
    August 27, 2008 at 11:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    To me "Get Oil Out" means just that - Get it out of the ground and into the refineries. I love our coastline and beautiful environment. I know the job can be done right. Do you think those platforms have just been pumping oil all these years? No, hundreds of successful wells have been drilled from those platforms in the last 20 years - and it's still going on today. No harm, no foul. To use oil patch language, let's get turning to the right!!

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 3 of 4 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 4

    osotoh (anonymous profile)
    August 27, 2008 at 2:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    This is what happens when you let the Vice President and the oil companies privately decide the country's energy policy. This is obviously very regressive. What is most troubling is that this discussion for some odd reason cannot be simultaneously discussed in the context of climate change that is quickly advancing upon this earth. I guess it would be just overwhelming for the dismissive drill, drill, drill proponents. I thought we were supposed to be fossil free by thirty-three. Regardless the sooner the better.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 2 of 5 • Thumbs Down: 3 of 5

    johnathansmith (anonymous profile)
    August 27, 2008 at 6:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    So are we-to-be oil-free in 33 or 29? Who came up with that plan? Pollyanna?

    That means no airline travel in 20 years. Well, that's cool because I hate airport security and love Santa Barbara.

    But seriously, what's the doable alternative energy plan for So Cal mass transportation, high-rise office AC/heating and the airline industry? Don't expect the oil companies to do figure that out. They are called oil companies for a reason.

    Where's the beef?

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 4 of 4 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 4

    osotoh (anonymous profile)
    August 27, 2008 at 7:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    The OPEC-Russia-chavez oil cartel is not just looting the United States, but the whole world, and will accumulate over $1.5 trillion in net profits this year. At their current rate of take, OPEC-Russia will acquire enough cash to buy majority control of every leading company in the United States within six years. And you are voting into power the very American-energy-traitors who are doing this to you and your country.

    OPEC loves American environmentalists, its making them rich. Big oil loves Enviro’s and Democrats too because it enables them to pump less oil for more money thus higher profits.

    The naysayers are so wrong.

    The new Santa Barbara OCS-State petroleum development project would reduce local fuel costs, have a daily send-out capacity of 100,000 BBL/day oil-gas. Enough to supply the daily needs of the entire Santa Barbara County as well as reduce imported oil needs for Southern California. www.strategicnine.com

    PRIMARY BENEFITS OFFERED TO SANTA BARBARA COUNTY RESIDENTS
    1. $2.50 GASOLINE for all registered Santa Barbara County residents and County vehicles from local oil production.
    2. $2.50 GASOLINE for all registered hotel guests in Santa Barbara County.
    3. County-wide Clean-Air, Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) car conversions facilities.
    4. $1.50 CNG for Santa Barbara and Coast residents for flexi-fuel vehicles.
    5. Substantial Annual Grants to local environmental study groups and renewable energy programs.
    6. Significant decrease in County-wide Air pollution from lower natural reservoir seepage.
    7. Much lower C02 emissions for the County and State of California.
    8. Significantly reduce potent greenhouse gas methane emissions from offshore gas seeps.
    9. Much cleaner Santa Barbara beaches and oceans by reduction in beach tar balls.
    10. Large new natural gas supplies from Bering Sea, landing via Santa Barbara County, to lower America’s C02 emissions from out of State coal-fired power plants, which will no longer be needed.
    11. Increased local, State and National energy income streams, with monies all staying inside the County and America.
    12. Provide Complete Santa Barbara energy self reliance and improve America’s energy security.
    13. Significant high-paying local jobs boost.
    14. Significant increased cash energy royalties to County of approximately $250-500 million p.a will improve the quality of life for all Santa Barbara County staff and local residents.
    15. Special Proposed Community royalty payment from Bering Sea Gas imports landings to fund FREE County-Wide clinics and a new FREE County Hospital.
    16. Lower-cost CNG for public transport-busses and vans, will enable disadvantaged and senior citizens to travel more freely.
    17. Natural Gas for County home heating and cooking at a 30% discount to the prevailing rate.
    18. Significant Increase in Local Property Values due to many of the above benefits.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 2 of 4 • Thumbs Down: 2 of 4

    petersterling (anonymous profile)
    August 28, 2008 at 5:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    When Mobil oil wanted their Clearview project 14 years ago, guess what... oil was $30/barrel. They were stopped.

    Today, Oil is over $120/barrel. We kept the oil in the South Ellwood field, where it safely appreciated by a factor of 4.

    Every drop belongs to the public. Leaving the oil in the ground was probably the best public investment ever made in this County.

    Leave it in the ground another 14 or 28 years... after 28 years it will be worth $2000/barrel. Extracting it 28 years from now will be way safer than today, due to new technology.

    It is safer, smarter, and a better investment to leave the oil in the ground as long as possible. Sure, all the spendthrift, me-generation, live-on-credit, don't save for tomorrow whiners want to pump the oil now.

    Leave it in the ground as long as possible.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 1 of 2

    sevendolphins (anonymous profile)
    August 28, 2008 at 8:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    I agree with sevendolphins. People who propose drilling are not thinking in terms of fiscal responsibility or military strategy, which ironic since many proponents of drilling seem to claim to be Republicans, and these used to be core Republican values. If we drill now, we won't have our reserves in the event of a war or an embargo from the middle east oil cartels.

    And anyway, our coastlines already have more than enough drilling platforms. The safest option in terms of public safety and environmental health would be for oil companies to focus on maintaining the platforms they have. The companies could also use slant drilling techniques to access oil using the platforms they already have.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 2 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 2

    UCCU (anonymous profile)
    August 28, 2008 at 11:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    AShaw; Great Sci-Fi. Can't wait for the paperback and the DVD. Al Gore has only a few naysayers but 1000 + scientists-climatologists peer reviewed actual science. Obama "wants us to wait" is your editorial spin.

    petersterling; The traitors would be the oil companies if you really think that they would permit a "State" oil supply that would; "1. $2.50 GASOLINE for all registered Santa Barbara County residents and County vehicles from local oil production." The oil companies like the pricing the way it is right now. The oil companies would start a civil war or some other catastrophe to keep the status quo.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 1 of 1 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 1

    johnathansmith (anonymous profile)
    August 29, 2008 at 10:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Pass the DRILL-NOW plan, by the time the production of those Oil platforms are operational, (5) five years will have passed. In (2) two years, after that, the price of Oil will have Quadruplied and we in America won't be driving (unless you wealthy) or flying anywhere. Our view to wait will have left this economy in total disaray and the options to change that would have passed us by. I remember, removing the gobs of tar from my feet and that oily feeling from my body from a day at the Goleta beach. Researchers, have been showing to the public, that oil has been leaking from cracks in the shelf and fisures for Millions of years. The Oil spill from 1969, was an error that back then we (America) had little experience cleaning up or preventing. Now, we are very much more experienced in drilling, transporting and storing. We even have better, more effectent methods of clean-up that we didn't back in the Late 60's. In any event, "We snooze, we loose", on the Oil issue.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 2 of 2 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 2

    dou4now (anonymous profile)
    August 30, 2008 at 6:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    The Coal Oil Point Preserve's near (not "under") Holly, not Hondo. And the Greater Santa Barbara Channel Petroleum Co-Prosperity Sphere might be a bit more about installing an LNG terminal than about producing oil.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    CharlesB (anonymous profile)
    September 5, 2008 at 8:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    54.0°
    Wind:
    6 W

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    3. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    4. Nothing to Hide Anymore
    5. Teacher in Trouble
    6. Gardens of Rare Books
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.