• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • NewsFlash
  • Arts & Entertainment
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals

Change for the Better, Council Says

Only Francisco Sides With Neighbor Critics to Cottage Hospital Housing


Wednesday, April 30, 2008
By Nick Welsh (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

Even the two Santa Barbara City councilmembers most critical of Cottage Hospital’s proposal to build 115 new homes — 70 percent of which will be sold at below market prices to Cottage employees at the site of its former competitor, St. Francis Hospital — agreed that the changed made to the design since the City Council approved it last November made it better. Neighborhood critics who argued that the changes, which resulted in an expansion of the building envelope and a reduction in the amount of open space, found little traction in their effort to send Cottage back to the drawing boards. They charged that Cottage seriously underrepresented the true size of its actual proposal, understating the size of one garage by 17,000 square feet and vastly underestimating the amount of demolition trucks would have to haul away. As a result, these critics say, the environmental mitigations required were insufficient.

Councilmember Das Williams, who voted against Cottage’s original housing proposal, said he could not find an “intellectually honest reason” to support the appeal. New councilmember Dale Francisco — who had campaigned against the housing project — praised the changes, but voted in favor of the neighbors’ appeal anyway. He did so, he said, because he felt members of Architectural Board of Review were improperly admonished not to consider the project’s size bulk and scale when the changes were reviewed.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Clear Sky
Temperature:
53.1°
Wind:
5 SSW

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Info
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Blue & Green Guide 2007
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Zaca Fire 2007
  • Five Candidates Vie for the County’s Hottest Supervisorial Seat
  • An Interview with Willie Brown
  • Judge Joe Lodge Dies
  • U.S. Military Measures Climate Change
  • A Taste of Hotel Café Helps Bid SOhO’s Anna Zamir a Fond Farewell
  • Wheels of Hope
  1. News-Press, Indy Settle Lawsuit
  2. Nuns Leaving Town
  3. Judge Joe Lodge Dies
  4. The Hidden Costs of Mountain Biking
  5. Montecito Debates Rick Caruso’s Miramar Remodel
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.