• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • NewsFlash
  • Arts & Entertainment
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals

    Credit: Ben Ciccati

    The Academic Focus Block Schedule

    A Better Way to Learn


    Thursday, April 10, 2008
    By Jack Hobbs
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Why is it that people think having six classes in one day is the only way high schools can or should be structured? This is not the way college students organize their school days, nor do we see elementary students switching rooms and teachers every hour. If you think about it, how many workplaces expect employees to switch locations every hour, changing bosses and coworkers? If pressed, the reason people will usually give for moving thousands of people every hour in a high school is something like, “Well, it’s because that’s the way it’s always been done.”

    At San Marcos, we have designed a better way to structure the day to meet the demands of the 21st century. Our students focus on three or four classes a day with only one passing period in the morning and one in the afternoon. Classes are 90 minutes long, and students complete at least three in the fall and three in the spring. Teachers meet with 96 students a day instead of 160. The vast majority of our students go on to succeed at some of the country’s top institutions of higher learning.

    This modified school day, the result of extensive research and a lot of hard work, has been successfully used here for the past 13 years, and it has created an atmosphere on our campus that is much more conducive to learning. Select any criteria for measuring student performance — test scores, countywide competitions, graduation rates, state accreditation reviews, surveys of stakeholders, or college acceptance rates — and you will see that this school excels.

    One of the most common misperceptions we have to deal with each year involves dismissals. We cannot offer four classes to every student on campus who wishes to take them, since we are staffed with the understanding that six classes per year is a full schedule for a teacher. The reason we can offer extra classes at all is because every teacher on our staff agrees to teach six classes instead of five.

    No student is granted a dismissal without parent or guardian consent. Some students choose to come to school at 9:30 a.m. instead of 7:30 a.m., and others may leave campus at 1:30 p.m. Most take an additional class, participate in sports during fourth block, or stay on campus to do homework in study hall during their free period. There are also many students who earn credits by working as lab or office assistants, library aides, or teaching assistants.

    Many students also put this extra time they’re given to full use by taking classes at UCSB or SBCC that we aren’t able to offer here, like Japanese or astronomy, or they take care of their community service requirements. Some participate in job internships, giving them a head start on their chosen careers. San Marcos students volunteer at Cottage Hospital, tutor in elementary classes, and coach sports. And yet, you probably wouldn’t know about this unless you’re a San Marcos parent. These students don’t expect any glory or recognition (or pay) for their work, and this is why most people never hear about the hundreds of thousands of hours they have donated throughout the years. By the way, the community service requirement was another restructuring innovation piloted at San Marcos, and it is now in place at all the high schools in Santa Barbara.

    Another misconception is that students don’t learn as well in the longer classes, that they can’t sit still that long, or that they will forget what they’ve learned if they don’t take a particular subject all year long. Well, none of the teachers at San Marcos expects students to sit for 90 minutes of lecturing. Classes move at a fast pace with several varied activities and approaches to make sure students grasp the material before moving on.

    Granted, there is a need for review in some classes, just as there is after summer break. Most teachers in the core academic subjects devote time to reviewing material that students need to remember before moving on in the first week of a new term.

    So, given these misconceptions and the challenges of just being “different,” wouldn’t it be easier just to give up the fight, fall in line, and go back to a traditional six-period day? It might be easier, but we feel it would be a serious mistake to go down that road. We have looked at the overall performance of San Marcos students since this schedule was implemented, and we’ve found convincing evidence that, for most students, academic success is enhanced when they are permitted to focus on fewer subjects at a time, with longer class periods and fewer disruptions in the school day.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    I am assuming Mr. Hobbs, an English teacher by profession, is well versed in rhetoric. I'm thinking he is, because he uses it extensively to persuade the reader that black is white (or perhaps black is grey).

    If, as he argues San Marcos has: "designed a better way to structure the day to meet the demands of the 21st century," why is there no empirical evidence to substantiate this? Instead the only evidence he gives is the classic bland generalization: "The vast majority of our students go on to succeed at some of the country’s top institutions of higher learning." I'm afraid that all three local high schools could make this identical claim, and two don't use the block schedule. Instead, if you look at the only empirical evidence that can logically compare the three high schools, state standardized testing, San Marcos is currently second out of the three, and was third out of the three last year. This hardly seems like "a better way to structure the day to meet the demands of the 21st century." And if you investigate how San Marcos overtook Santa Barbara High to become number two in the district on standardized testing, you will find that they used mostly gimmicks like rewarding students who achieved on the state tests with things like preferred parking spots, longer lunches, and off campus permits. This hardly speaks well for block scheduling.

    sbboyo (anonymous profile)
    April 11, 2008 at 8:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    I feel I must comment on Mr. Sbboyo's comments on Mr. Hobbs' commentary. I couldn't agree with Mr. Sbboyo more. Furthermore let me add a few more details.

    Mr. Hobbs states: "Select any criteria for measuring student performance — test scores, countywide competitions, graduation rates, state accreditation reviews, surveys of stakeholders, or college acceptance rates — and you will see that this school excels." (test scores: San Marcos is second, has been as low as third, and has never been first in the district; graduation rates are nearly identical for the three high schools; state accreditation reviews are identical--all three high schools received the same term of accreditation; surveys of stakeholders: worthless, as most stakeholders are true to their own schools; and college acceptance rates: again, not too different than the other schools). Again, all three high schools can make the same claims, and two don't use the block schedule. This is hardly "excelling." It's more like "regression towards the mean." Mr. Hobbs shouldn't be using evidence that puts his school on an equal footing, he should be using evidence that puts his school above the other two. How about National Merit Scholar semi-finalists? San Marcos consistently has less than half of Dos Pueblos. The reason he doesn't have use better evidence because there is no evidence that his school's system is better.

    Here is another point. When San Marcos won the restructuring grant to implement the block schedule in 1994, the district said that if it proved to be better, the other two high schools would switch to it. After 12 years of its existence, San Marcos was third out of the three high schools in student achievement. Hardly a rousing success. If you noticed, the district has not switched the other two high schools to the block system.

    The reason why people like Jack Hobbs defend the system is because the teachers like it. Get one of them alone, give them a drink, and they'll tell you the truth--they don't have to work as hard.

    San Marcos loses more students to Dos Pueblos and Santa Barbara than they receive back from those schools. I hear that many students leave because of the block system.

    Full disclosure: I am a Santa Barbara High teacher who was present when we competed against San Marcos for the restructuring grant of 1994. We lost. Maybe this is all sour grapes. Maybe there is truth to what I'm saying.

    SantaBarbaraDon (anonymous profile)
    April 11, 2008 at 9:03 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    A schedule is secondary. What's important is what's going on in the classroom:

    http://www.middleweb.com/MWLresources/bl...

    Lee (anonymous profile)
    April 12, 2008 at midnight (Suggest removal)

    Lots of arguments of cause and effect, and the truth is that no one is certain about the critical aspect of what makes the best structure. Education is complex, and in the end, the single most important factor in student achievement (defined by much more than test scores) is teacher quality.

    According to Rethinking High School: Best Practice in Teaching, Learning and Leadership by Harvey Daniels, Marilyn Bizar, Steven Zemelman (2001, Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH) “…teacher expertise has been found to be the most significant determinant of student success (Darling-Hammond 1996).”

    Pay our teachers more, don’t accept mediocrity, and give all staff professional freedom to work as they have been trained to do without regard to politics and the agendas set by bureaucracies.

    santabarbaracalifornia (anonymous profile)
    April 14, 2008 at 1 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Well, I went to SM, experienced the block schedule, and I absolutely loved it. Let me tell you, there's nothing more frustrating (to a student that actually wants to learn, as opposed to socializing and such) than having the bell ring, your teacher takes attendance, you go over homework and questions, the teacher presents the lesson plan for the day, everyone gets settled, the teacher teaches, and then 20 minutes later it's time to pack up and get herded off to the next class. I learned so much while I was at SM, and I truly believe I excelled due to the block scheduling. Criticize all you want, but the block schedule makes sense, and unless you've been a student there, or you have a child that is in fact a student there, you really have no ground to walk on. Go Royals!

    pinkerbell03 (anonymous profile)
    April 14, 2008 at 10:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    To SantaBarbaraDon:

    You have some good points. However, I must disagree with your view that San Marcos teachers do not work as hard. If you are a teacher at SB as you say, you teach 5 classes a year with a max of 35 kids in each class. So you teach 5 classes and 175 students in a year. At San Marcos, teachers teach 6 classes in a year, with a max of 31 in a class. So they teach 6 classes and 186 students in a year. Seems to me they do more than you do.

    Also, which system prepares students for the quarter system at UC's and most other colleges? The block system does.

    Now, is the block system for everyone? No. That is why we have three excellent high schools in this area, so families have a choice of where they want to go to. All three schools advertise for students. This article is San Marcos' advertisement.

    Inthemiddle (anonymous profile)
    April 14, 2008 at 11:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    48.9°
    Wind:
    3 NNE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Summer Camp Guide 2008
    • Wedding Guide 2008
    • SBIFF 2008 All Access
    • 2008 Election Info
    • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
    • Local Bands
    • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
    • Blue & Green Guide 2007
    • Made in Santa Barbara
    • Zaca Fire 2007
    • Five Candidates Vie for the County’s Hottest Supervisorial Seat
    • An Interview with Willie Brown
    • Judge Joe Lodge Dies
    • U.S. Military Measures Climate Change
    • A Taste of Hotel Café Helps Bid SOhO’s Anna Zamir a Fond Farewell
    • Wheels of Hope
    1. News-Press, Indy Settle Lawsuit
    2. Nuns Leaving Town
    3. Judge Joe Lodge Dies
    4. The Hidden Costs of Mountain Biking
    5. Montecito Debates Rick Caruso’s Miramar Remodel
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.