• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

Necropsy Rules Out Domoic Acid Poisoning

Third Blue Whale Death Ruled Unusual Mortality Event


Monday, October 1, 2007
By Chris Meagher (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

A necropsy conducted on a blue whale carcass at Pt. Mugu showed the animal didn’t have any detectable levels of domoic acid in its system, contrary to scientific speculation last week.

The blue whale — the third killed by a ship strike off the Southern California coast in September — was first spotted floating in the Santa Barbara Channel off of Platform Gail on Thursday, September 20. A storm then moved the body to an eddy, where it circled between Platform Gail and Platform Grace. The whale had not been dead long, scientists determined, because the skin was still intact and blue, and there were no major external injuries.

Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History’s assistant curator of vertebrate zoology, Michelle Berman, called the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and asked that the animal be brought in, because fresher testing means better results, explained museum spokesperson Easter Moorman. The whale was taken to Pt. Mugu, where a day-long necropsy was conducted on Saturday, September 22. It was determined the whale had a smashed cranium, broken ribs, and a severed backbone. Additonally, no sonar activity was linked to the death.

At the time, scientists believed domoic poisoning could’ve been a contributing factor to the whale’s death. The neurotoxin exists in algae and if eaten could have hindered the whale’s ability to quickly get out of the way of, or see, an oncoming ship. The three blue whale deaths have been identified by the NOAA as unusual mortality events (UMEs).

The first whale, a sub-adult male estimated to be between 65 and 70 feet long, came into Long Beach Harbor on the bow of a ship on Saturday, September 8, and was ruled dead from a ship strike, though no necropsy was performed. The animal was later towed out to sea. Rumors that the whale was floating not far off the shore of San Clemente and Ensenada have not been verified.

A necropsy was done on the second dead whale, which washed ashore on Hobson Beach in Ventura County. The 72-foot long female whale, who also died from a ship strike, was eventually cut up and buried on Faria Beach about two miles away.

NOAA is asking the public to notify the Marine Mammal Stranding Network if they spot any floating whales. Call the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History at 682-4711 ext. 157.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

How about a speed limit in the channel? Those ships are deadly for whales and are very serious for small boats. Easy to figure that if three dead (and rare) blue whales have been found, others injured have not been found.

LA/Long Beach-bound container and other large ships should go outside the islands. Speeds within the channel should be low and monitored by the coast guard.

This is a federal issue; where's our representative, what's she doing on this issue?

1066etal (anonymous profile)
October 2, 2007 at 8:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Mist
Temperature:
60.1°
Wind:
6 SSE

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Wedding Guide 2009
  • SBIFF 2009
  • Local Heroes 2008
  • Best Of 2008
  • Tea Fire 2008
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • 2008 Election Coverage
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Summer Reading
  • Santa Barbara Reads 2009 Chooses Fahrenheit 451
  • East Beach Water Contamination Mystery Continues
  • El Corazón del Perro
  • The Stone Foxes Return to Rock’s Roots
  • Horseback Riding Helps Local Vets
  1. Cottage, Sansum May Fuse
  2. Pacific Capital Bancorp Refutes Takeover Gossip
  3. Santa Barbara Named One of “Ten Pricey Cities That Pay Off”
  4. Santa Barbara Scrapbooks to Close Its Doors
  5. Official Michael Jackson Party Announced
  6. Deceased Man Found in Car on Coast Village Road
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.