• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Paul Wellman

    Bottled Water Ban

    Santa Barbara Beats S.F. to the Punch


    Thursday, June 28, 2007
    By Nick Welsh (Contact)
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    While San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom grabbed headlines this week by banning his city’s departments from buying bottled water for city functions, the City of Santa Barbara quietly did the same thing two months ago with little fanfare. As part of City Hall’s broader sustainability campaign, no more plastic bottled water will be purchased for city meetings or events. Instead, iced tap water will be served out of carafes and poured into biodegradable cups and “glasses.” Santa Barbara’s water ban was declared in April, and implementation began last month. San Francisco’s will take effect in July.

    “A lot of energy is consumed making the plastic bottles in the first place, and then even more shipping it the distance getting the water to us,” explained City Hall sustainability czar Nina Johnson (pictured above left with recycling guru Eric Lohela.). “We want to lead by example, and to us it doesn’t make sense to buy bottled water when we have perfectly good water right here at the tap.” Johnson said she’s heard no complaints about the new program. But Mayor Marty Blum, normally a loud supporter of green initiatives, said she has her doubts. “This one came out of the city administrator’s office, and I’ve heard some grumblings,” she said. “I don’t know if it’s going to stick.” Blum noted that City Hall encourages residents to keep a supply of bottled water on hand for emergencies and to replace them every six months. “I think we might be sending mixed messages,” Blum said.

    The policy itself is fairly limited. It bars the expenditure of city funds on bottled water in plastic containers for city meetings and special events. Johnson said she doesn’t know how much City Hall currently spends on bottled water. (San Francisco spent about $2 million on bottled water last year.) The new policy will not prohibit city employees from bringing their own bottled water to work if they choose. “As far as I know, bottled water has yet to become a controlled substance,” observed Cathy Taylor, a city water engineer and supporter of the program. Taylor acknowledged that the taste of Santa Barbara water — due to its high mineral content — has driven many customers to seek alternatives to what comes from the city’s taps. Taylor also noted that the city’s water — however it tastes — meets more stringent state and federal water purity standards than do the manufacturers of bottled water. She also said City Hall is exploring new water purification processes — designed to meet the EPA’s increasingly tight drinking water quality standards — that would incidentally improve the taste of the city’s tap water.

    In a related but separate development, Mayor Blum and City Councilmember Helene Schneider are spearheading an effort to paint a light blue line on Santa Barbara’s streets and sidewalks, showing how high the water would rise — and where Santa Barbara’s “new” seashore would be located — should Greenland’s ice sheets melt and the sea level rise approximately 21 feet. The plan comes before the City Council next Tuesday, though in revised form to address concerns of public works administrators. Rather than using an expensive process to permanently bake the light blue line onto city streets and sidewalks — as was initially proposed — light blue line advocates are now willing to use traditional paint and brush to make their environmental point. Although this will lack the permanence the organizers initially sought, it will also eliminate the need to go through the time-consuming rigors of the Historic Landmarks Commission. Assuming the plan wins support from a majority of councilmembers, the light blue line could be painted onto city streets and sidewalks sometime this September.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    What a crock.

    The municipal water is way high in dissolved minerals. That is why most people drink bottled or filtered water in the first place, and why the local industry to filter water is thriving and profiting heavily.

    At night, the reservoir water is blended with well water, yielding a higher sulphur content and odor. Chloramines also are nearly at the legal limit, which is why it is blended with well water.

    Just like groovy restaurants do, the City needs to provide filtered water in bulk instead. It can be consumed out of those chic corn-starch cups they all are so proud of.

    A compromise position can be to make water available in large jugs and served in cups. What is old is new again.
    The common answer, then, is that city staff simply no longer will provide water to anyone in a meeting.

    If the City really wanted to do something about energy and water consumption, it would stop approving McMansions and market rate condos that only stimulate an industry of working poor people to serve all these new rich arrivals. Those working poor people burn up all the fuel and produce all the CO2 the City is so fakely concerned about.

    Readers say: Thumbs Up: 0 of 0 • Thumbs Down: 0 of 0

    FirstDistrictStreetfighter (anonymous profile)
    June 28, 2007 at 2:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)

    Post a comment

    Username:
    Password: (Forgotten your password?)

    Comment:

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    63.0°
    Wind:
    8 SE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    3. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    4. Nothing to Hide Anymore
    5. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    6. Teacher in Trouble
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.