• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

NLRB Round One


Tuesday, January 9, 2007
By Matt Kettmann (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

Scott Steepleton Takes the Stand Tuesday Morning

Despite the level of anticipation gripping Santa Barbarans over the fate of their longtime daily newspaper, the courtroom pews were only halfway filled on Tuesday at 9 a.m. in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court on State Street. nlrb.jpg That's when the Judge William L. Schmidt, as the eyes and ears of the National Labor Relations Board, began hearing objections from News-Press management over the newsroom's 33-6 September 27 vote in favor of joining the Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters.

One the left side of the room seated before the judge was David Millstein and Sandra McCandless, who played the lead attorney role in this proceeding. Next to them was Scott Steepleton, the white-haired, stout N-P editor dressed in crisp white shirt and purple-pink tie who took the witness stand first.

On the right side was Teamsters attorney Ira Gottlieb and former N-P reporter Melinda Burns. And after some pre-hearing talk about whether Teamsters rep Marty Keegan was served a subpoena at his place of business or at a "house with the barking dogs," Keegan himself walked through the doors and took his seat.

Before beginning, the judge reminded the N-P legal team that although they've raised these objections, they can rescind any or all of them at any time. "Don't dismiss that as a crazy thought," said Schmidt, who was wearing a polka dotted bow tie. "It's not the end of the world to sit at the bargaining table and have discussions that may or may not lead to a collective bargaining agreement." He then advised that perhaps the Teamsters might also consider a similar path and retry the vote, especially because their margin of victory was so high. Both sides thanked him for the opportunity, but then trudged forth.

Explaining the hearing, Judge Schmidt explained that the News-Press management had the burden of proof to show that their objections did "destroy the laboratory conditions, or at least impair the laboratory conditions" of the election. McCandless declined to give an opening argument, merely stating that she did not believe the laboratory conditions were present.

Ira's Opening

Gottlieb, however, did give a statement to the effect that this hearing was "not about due process." "We're here because of denial and delay," said Gottlieb, citing the overwhelming majority (85 percent) of the newsroom staff in favor of unionization. He then said that the objections were examples of "frivolity" in that three of the four had already been reviewed and tossed out by the National Labor Relations Board as unfair labor practices. (That does not automatically mean, however, that this judge will rule the same way.)

The other claim about an anonymous threat posted on the Blogabarbara website was also a moot point, offered Gottlieb, because the News-Press management itself later posted the threat themselves. Regardless, third party threats, Gottlieb explained, were no longer given much consideration by the NLRB. And furthermore, the NLRB found about 10 years ago that two bomb threats were not enough to overturn a union vote that only had 59 percent support.

But at the heart of Gottlieb's opening was this central notion: management's claim that the various Teamster activities influenced the election is bogus because reporters, as a lot, are not easily fooled. "They're trained to check out sources, trained to be skeptical," said Gottlieb, explaining that, contrary to management's claims, the newsroom staff did not ever think that the Wendy McCaw and her management team ever endorsed the union. Gottlieb would later produce anti-union editorials penned by Wendy McCaw, who was not present, and Travis Armstrong, who was in the courtroom, wearing a tan coat, dark grey tie, and blue-and-white pinstriped shirt.

What Does Scott Know?

With that, Scott Steepleton, a nearly seven-year N-P editor, took the stand. McCandless called Steepleton, who current newsroom employees claim is the face of much intimidation these days, in an attempt to show that supervisors were involved in the union organizing efforts, that the Teamsters were secretly behind the SavetheNewsPress.com website and subscription cancellation plans, that the newsroom was intimidating when it marched through the halls and tried to deliver McCaw a letter, and that the threat posted on Blogabarbara was indeed threatening.

Steepleton was on vacation when Jerry Roberts resigned and the first wave of newsroom employees left, but came back to get a promotion to city editor. He described the newsroom atmosphere as "quite tense," that reporters would go from desk to desk "whispering," and said that one reporter called him aside and said that "things are going to happen but don't take them personal."

Steepleton spent a good deal of time describing the SavetheNewsPress.com website, and tried to give the impression that he thought it was run by newsroom employees. But then he discovered some Teamsters support when he "drilled down" into the website, which was apparently a ploy by McCandless to show that the union engaged in misrepresentation. He also recalled seeing reporter Tom Schultz's car with the News-Press masthead (which the witness called a "logo") and a "Save the News-Press" poster. Judge Schmidt, however, said that the NLRB no longer cared about misrepresentation, so McCandless claimed that it was more like forgery, and therefore a different matter. The judge took it under consideration.

To describe the time that newsroom employees marched toward Wendy McCaw's office with a letter of demands, Steepleton stood and stomped his feet loudly. He said that he was scared it was another "mass resignation" and that he may have to put out the paper himself. He later said he was also intimidated by what he described as a "mob" standing at Wendy McCaw's office door, jiggling her doorknob, and trying to get in. That march eventually led to Yolanda Apodaca's office, which prompted Gottlieb to call for Apodaca, who was seated next to Travis Armstrong in the courtroom wearing a black jacket and black spectacles, to be sequestered. The judge denied that.

As for Blogabarbara, Steepleton described it as a "local website that essentially pokes fun at the Santa Barbara News-Press." He saw a copy of the threat that was posted on the website, which outlined a way to take out much of the newspaper's staff. Steepleton said what concerned him first was the date, September 11, suggesting that it was a connection to terrorism and that as such the threat should be considered serious.

Breaktime and Then Some

During a short break, many former and current News-Press staffers mingled in the main lobby area with smiles, including Tom Schultz, who was wearing a piece of duct tape twisted into a ribbon and pinned to his lapel. Meanwhile, the tall Travis Armstrong, the paper's editorial page editor whose shift last summer to a newsroom supervisor triggered much of the meltdown, talked to attorneys Millstein and McCandless in the corner. Steepleton emerged from the courtroom and walked straight to the restroom, without so much as a nod to anyone.

After the break, The Indy was drawn into the mess when a photocopied page was entered as an exhibit to show that one supervisor named Dale Myers was involved at a rally. (He was in a photograph.) Steepleton also testified that Andrea Huebner, the paper's former Life editor, was at a rally too. It was then Gottlieb's turn for cross-examination, which lasted until lunch at 12:20 p.m. Gottlieb went on the offensive against Steepleton, trying to get him impeached for having been a liar (based on his alleged March 2000 firing from the LA Times for being "dishonest") and for having motivations against the employees. Millstein shot up from his seat to get those charges omitted from the record, but the judge denied it. McCandless was allowed to go on the record explaining that just because Gottlieb raises these points don't make them true.

Gottlieb spent awhile going through the newspaper management's moves leading up to the unionization drive. Included in those tactics were the hiring of consultants Bob Long and Jim Anderson, who advised on how to bust the union, and head counts of who might vote.

The judge was not impressed with this line of inquiry, because it showed the obvious strategies employed by any employer in a similar situation. Noting that what Gottlieb wanted to know was probably the result of such counting, the judge blurted, "You'd have to be blind, deaf (which he pronounced "deef"), and dumb not to find out who was for the union and who was against the union." It was an example of the relaxed courtroom atmosphere in this hearing, where, without a jury watching on, the judge is able to move questioning along quickly, accept more hearsay and less foundation that normal, and even advise the lawyers on how to better ask their questions. In some cases, the judge himself asked the pertinent questions.

Admitting the Numbers

When finally asked the result of those head counts, Steepleton said, "Our assessment was that the union would win the election," confirming that it would be by "a large percentage." Though testimony carried on from there, including an audience-laughter-fueling claim by Steepleton that he doesn't have anything to do with the editorials and that he doesn't regularly read them, this admission by Steepleton seems to be crucial to all of the objections levied by the newspaper's management.

If Steepleton and the rest of the N-P management admit that "a large percentage" of the newsroom staff were going to vote in favor of joining a union, doesn't that mean that none of their objections have merit? Given that Steepleton admitted more than 25 people were marching in the office, it seems that the News-Press is admitting that the pro-union vote was inevitable. Doesn't that make this all a waste of time?

In any case, it's time to head back to the courtroom right now. It's about 2:30 p.m., and court's been going on for more than an hour now, likely with either Travis Armstrong or Yolanda Apodaca on the stand. Check back later for another report.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

I am quite sure that readers here would prefer to read the full article a little later in the day rather than have the reporter miss some of the proceeding, especially with those witnesses.

Overall, bloody good work for the Indy to get this posted so fast and detailed.

David Pritchett
January 9, 2007 at 3:05 p.m.

Thanks for the informative & balanced update. Impressive job.

Harriet
January 9, 2007 at 3:09 p.m.

awesome job, veteran court reporter!

chuckeroo
January 9, 2007 at 4:25 p.m.

Calm down David. We have more than one reporter on the story and we didn't miss a thing.

matt
January 9, 2007 at 4:31 p.m.

Great work, Matt. This is what it's all about: lucid narrative about an important moment, accurately delivered in a timely fashion. Bulls eye.

StreetPainter
January 9, 2007 at 5:47 p.m.

I cannot attend the hearing due to my day job committments, and I'm sure I'm not the only one in this situation.
Thank you, Matt and the Indy staff, for such fast reporting.

SBCitizen
January 9, 2007 at 6:03 p.m.

Superb. I'd need to pay for SBNP version. Or wait for what I can find! Yes, people do work. Did SBNP have many in attendance?

anonymous
January 9, 2007 at 6:35 p.m.

In attendance for the SBNP management were Travis Armstrong, Yolanda Apodaca, and Scott Steepleton (though he left after finishing his testimony). That was it.

As for former staffers, there was Dale Myers, Jane Hulse, Don Murphy, Andrea Huebner (all four testified), Melinda Burns (sitting at the lawyers table), Tom Schultz, Barney McManigal, Starshine Roshell, and a couple others whose names I do not know. Can someone fill in the blanks?

I am ready to post this next installment of the afternoon affair, but I am just waiting for Nick Welsh's reportage, since he got to see Travis and Yolanda while I was writing this tome above. Shucks for me, as I heard Travis said that Marty Keegan was lurking outside his apartment window, among other charges and that he was super scared of the marchers. Yolanda, despite getting the Angel of Death moniker from departed staffers, was apparently pretty level-headed and fair.

Look for it soon.

matt k
January 9, 2007 at 6:54 p.m.

Schultz and McManigal not former.

not former
January 9, 2007 at 7:31 p.m.

Thank you so much for this. It is absolutely appreciated and exactly the sort of report the occasion merited.

journalism101
January 9, 2007 at 7:44 p.m.

I was there for a little while this morning and was inpressed that the Judge was competent, no-nonsense and determined to run a tight ship. Thank you, Indy, for your diligent, and clear reporting. It is appreciated. Looking forward to your next post.

s.b.ron
January 9, 2007 at 8:20 p.m.

Since I no longer live in Santa Barbara, I've been looking forward to your coverage. So far, so good! Keep up the good work.

Al Bonowitz
January 9, 2007 at 8:47 p.m.

Yes Matt this was a very descriptive detail of the proceedings.

I loved the fashion details and I had no idea, from his picutre in the SBNP and his voice on the radio, that Travis Armstrong would be described as "tall." I had always assumed Travis would resemble a tiny little man.

Don
January 9, 2007 at 9:43 p.m.

Matt Kettmann is rather short, so Travis Armstrong seems tall. He is quite average in height, and well below average in other features.

tall is relative
January 9, 2007 at 10:07 p.m.

Great reporting, Indy.

Why wouldn't/shouldn't Wendy McCaw be called to testify tomorrow, along with her loverboy/"publisher"?

As Nick correctly called in the Poodle back in June, before Bloody Thursday, she is self-inflictive of wounds, and has brought the entire Mess to this point.

If she were gone tomorrow, it would take the paper a generation to recover, maybe longer.

Where's Wendy??
January 10, 2007 at 12:04 a.m.

Gotta love the Blogs getting into this mess. Without the New Media, including the Indpendent online, where would we get our information?
http://blogabarbara.blogspot.com/

Another good one is Santa Barbara's Blog:
http://www.santabarbarasblog.com/

Blog Fan
January 10, 2007 at 11:23 a.m.

Matt should stick with reporting and omit the inept attempt at analysis. Since the N-P isn't claiming that the votes were miscounted, the head count has no bearing on the merit of their objections; their claim is that the pro-union vote was a result of intimidation and misrepresentation. (That these are frivolous charges, unsupported by the evidence, is another matter.)

truthmachine
January 10, 2007 at 2:16 p.m.

Does "truthmachine" mean the kind of reporting in the no by-line article by Steepleton today where the Newspress only wrote about its own positions during the legal hearing for NLRB?

The reason readers indeed read the Indy is exactly FOR the analysis. Otherwise, be happy, truthmachine, with Agnes Huff n Puff for your plain reporting. Angry Poodle, anyone?

First District Streetfighter
January 10, 2007 at 4:38 p.m.

FDS, did you even read my comment before responding to it? You certainly didn't comprehend it.

truthmachine
January 12, 2007 at 2:14 a.m.

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Mist
Temperature:
62.1°
Wind:
5 W

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Coverage
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Zaca Fire 2007
  • How a Group of Ex-Catholic Nuns Saved Their Famous Montecito Retreat Center
  • What Dems Are Doing in Denver While Republicans Ready for St. Paul
  • Runner Killed by Alleged DUI Driver
  • To Err Is Human, to Forgive Is Canine
  • Brian Wilson’s That Lucky Old Sun Tour Rises at the Lobero
  • S.B. Police Chief Wants Cops to Learn from Holocaust Survivors
  1. H2Oprah
  2. Drunk Driving Death on Las Positas Road
  3. County Flood Preparation Work Begins Following Gap Fire
  4. Radiohead Mesmerizes Santa Barbara
  5. S.B. Police Chief Wants Cops to Learn from Holocaust Survivors
  6. Gregory Doan Charged in Las Positas Road Runover
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.