Escrow Funds Vanish; Inamed Founder Accused of Embezzling Millions
by Martha Sadler
A class action lawsuit filed against a
Montecito financial company alleges that it, along with an
affiliated company in Nevada, “misappropriated, stole, embezzled,
and converted” more than $80 million from escrow accounts within
the past year. One of the chief defendants named in the lawsuit is
Donald McGhan, 73, who was the founder, chairman, and president of
the McGhan Medical Corporation, maker of silicone breast implants
and for many years one of the region’s top employers. McGhan left
the company — now called Inamed Aesthetics — in 1998, and the
company later settled a fraud suit filed by the Securities and
Exchange Commission alleging that McGhan had filed false financial
statements that misled the investing public. His son, James McGhan,
who with his father founded a plastic surgery products company
called Medicor Ltd., is also a defendant in the recently filed
class action suit.
In addition to Medicor, the McGhans own or control a Delaware corporation called Capital Reef Management, according to the suit filed February 16 in Santa Barbara County Superior Court by the local law firm of Hollister & Brace. In October, Capital Reef purchased Qualified Exchange Services (QES) — a small company located at 1115 Coast Village Road in Montecito — founded by Kyleen Dawson and Megan Amsler. After selling QES, the two founders remained as employees of their former business. Three months later, they reported to the FBI that some of their clients’ funds were missing. They are also named in the suit as defendants, although their attorney, Craig Grenet, said the incident hurt them as well as their clients. “They are just as much victims of this as anybody,” Genet said.
The attorney for the plaintiffs, Robert Brace, disagreed, calling Dawson and Amsler negligent for failing to protect his clients’ money. However, he seemed to reserve his greatest scorn for the McGhans, repeatedly referring to them — and to one of the other defendants, accountant Dean Koch — in the text of the lawsuit as the “thief defendants.” Koch was the chief financial officer of Southwest Exchange, Inc. (SWX) of Nevada, where Donald McGhan served as chairman of the board of directors, a company that became an affiliate of QES as a result of the Montecito company’s sale to Capital Reef. SWX and QES were both in the business of 1031 exchanges, which are the perfectly legal practice of avoiding capital gains taxes by exchanging one piece of property for another of equal or greater value instead of liquidating the asset. If the new property is purchased within six months of selling the first property, the seller does not have to pay capital gains — but during the interim, the money must be placed in trust, and that is where the exchange agents come in. They hold the money in trust for a fee.
The primary plaintiffs in the suit against QES and SWX are Jon and Marie Sorrell, who sold a home in Lake Arrowhead for about $720,000 on September 8, deposited the money from the sale in trust with QES, and then identified a house in Santa Ynez that they intended to buy with those proceeds. In late January, though, QES told them that the money was “no longer available.” Since then, according to the suit, plaintiffs have been told that QES is out of business. Calls to QES were answered by a recording but not returned.
On February 5, SWX and its three chief officers, including Donald McGhan, were suspended by Nevada’s Division of Real Estate. The collected assets were placed in receivership, following numerous complaints of missing funds. McGhan’s attorney, Mark Dzarnoski, said he had not yet been served with a copy of the class action suit.
Brace estimated that of those claiming to have lost funds, about 10 Santa Barbara-area residents are missing a total of about $10 million in assets entrusted to QES. Brace added that unlike banks, which are federally insured, and escrow companies, which are heavily regulated, exchange intermediaries are largely unregulated and uninsured. Most of their clients are probably unaware of that distinction, he said.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
So what happens to Medicor now?
jim nardone
February 23, 2007 at 12:27 p.m.
They(the McGhans')should be hung,drawn and quartered!
Anne
February 23, 2007 at 5:37 p.m.
Why stop with the McGhans?
anonymous
February 24, 2007 at 5:31 p.m.
For those who would like to take advantage of the benefits of a tax-deferred exchange, it is quite easy to avoid this kind of disaster. Seek a "qualified intermediary" that provides a written guarantee against such loss and then make sure you get a copy to review before you close a transaction. (An insurance policy or bond isn't always sufficient because it can lapse for a number of reasons, not the least of which is non-payment of premium.) Make sure that you, as the exchangor, are named in the guarantee and that it's time limit, if it has one, exceeds the 180-day (NOT 6 months) time period allowed by the IRS. A well-recognized National Title Insurance Company is usually your best bet.
another anonymous
February 25, 2007 at 11 a.m.
Actually Another Anonymous 11:00 AM, you are better off with a guarantee by the bank that is holding the funds that the funds will be available to complete your exchange. There really is no better protection than that. Also be sure you are getting ALL the interest these funds earn. There is no good reason for the qualified intermediary to get any of that interest.
anonymous
February 26, 2007 at 2:25 p.m.
Actually, anonymous, you're right. Getting a guarantee from a bank may work, but it isn't that simple. If the bank makes any tie of the funds to the exchangor, and just issuing an inadequately worded guarantee may do exactly that, there is constructive receipt of the proceeds by the exchangor and the exchange is blown, whereas a title company has a separate entity to act as a "qualified intermediary" holding the funds and the guarantee comes from the title company as a disinterested third party. Their guarantees have been very carefully worked out over time to avoid the constructive receipt aspect. If the bank has created such a guarantee, it could work. The title companies, however, have much more experience in this field and know how to avoid the pitfalls. Of course, as to the interest, the client is due a "growth factor" equal to all the interest earned. If you earn the "interest" directly, then it was your account, hence your funds and no tax-deferred exchange.
another anonymous
February 27, 2007 at 8:04 a.m.
You must use an Accommodator which is a subsidiary of a national title company. If not, this can happen at any time. I can't imagine a company like First American closing. They have been in California for over 100 years. I use First American Exchange out of Las Vegas and I know my funds are safe there.
anonymous
March 1, 2007 at 9:27 a.m.
For those that "lost" money with any of these three exchange company's, look for the deep pockets. In this case, the financial institutions that violated the Patriot Act by not reporting or allowing the movement of the money to ill-advised investments. This instition is primarily UBS, and secondarily, Silver State Bank.
Very Anonymous but accurate!
March 1, 2007 at 2:36 p.m.