• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • News Main Page
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • A&E Main Page
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Opinion Main Page
    • Endorsements
    • Blogs
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
    • Obituaries
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Living Main Page
    • Outdoors
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • Food & Drink Main Page
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Sports
  • Outdoors
    • Outdoors Main Page
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Obits

    Capital Loss


    Thursday, February 22, 2007
    By Martha Sadler
    Article Tools
    Print friendly
    E-mail story
    Tip Us Off
    iPod friendly
    Comments
    Bookmark This
    del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
    Digg! Digg!
    furl furl
    google google
    newsvine newsvine
    reddit reddit
    technorati technorati
    Facebook Facebook
    Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

    Escrow Funds Vanish; Inamed Founder Accused of Embezzling Millions

    by Martha Sadler

    QES.jpgA  class action lawsuit filed against a Montecito financial company alleges that it, along with an affiliated company in Nevada, “misappropriated, stole, embezzled, and converted” more than $80 million from escrow accounts within the past year. One of the chief defendants named in the lawsuit is Donald McGhan, 73, who was the founder, chairman, and president of the McGhan Medical Corporation, maker of silicone breast implants and for many years one of the region’s top employers. McGhan left the company — now called Inamed Aesthetics — in 1998, and the company later settled a fraud suit filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission alleging that McGhan had filed false financial statements that misled the investing public. His son, James McGhan, who with his father founded a plastic surgery products company called Medicor Ltd., is also a defendant in the recently filed class action suit.

    In addition to Medicor, the McGhans own or control a Delaware corporation called Capital Reef Management, according to the suit filed February 16 in Santa Barbara County Superior Court by the local law firm of Hollister & Brace. In October, Capital Reef purchased Qualified Exchange Services (QES) — a small company located at 1115 Coast Village Road in Montecito — founded by Kyleen Dawson and Megan Amsler. After selling QES, the two founders remained as employees of their former business. Three months later, they reported to the FBI that some of their clients’ funds were missing. They are also named in the suit as defendants, although their attorney, Craig Grenet, said the incident hurt them as well as their clients. “They are just as much victims of this as anybody,” Genet said.

    The attorney for the plaintiffs, Robert Brace, disagreed, calling Dawson and Amsler negligent for failing to protect his clients’ money. However, he seemed to reserve his greatest scorn for the McGhans, repeatedly referring to them — and to one of the other defendants, accountant Dean Koch — in the text of the lawsuit as the “thief defendants.” Koch was the chief financial officer of Southwest Exchange, Inc. (SWX) of Nevada, where Donald McGhan served as chairman of the board of directors, a company that became an affiliate of QES as a result of the Montecito company’s sale to Capital Reef. SWX and QES were both in the business of 1031 exchanges, which are the perfectly legal practice of avoiding capital gains taxes by exchanging one piece of property for another of equal or greater value instead of liquidating the asset. If the new property is purchased within six months of selling the first property, the seller does not have to pay capital gains — but during the interim, the money must be placed in trust, and that is where the exchange agents come in. They hold the money in trust for a fee.

    The primary plaintiffs in the suit against QES and SWX are Jon and Marie Sorrell, who sold a home in Lake Arrowhead for about $720,000 on September 8, deposited the money from the sale in trust with QES, and then identified a house in Santa Ynez that they intended to buy with those proceeds. In late January, though, QES told them that the money was “no longer available.” Since then, according to the suit, plaintiffs have been told that QES is out of business. Calls to QES were answered by a recording but not returned.

    On February 5, SWX and its three chief officers, including Donald McGhan, were suspended by Nevada’s Division of Real Estate. The collected assets were placed in receivership, following numerous complaints of missing funds. McGhan’s attorney, Mark Dzarnoski, said he had not yet been served with a copy of the class action suit.

    Brace estimated that of those claiming to have lost funds, about 10 Santa Barbara-area residents are missing a total of about $10 million in assets entrusted to QES. Brace added that unlike banks, which are federally insured, and escrow companies, which are heavily regulated, exchange intermediaries are largely unregulated and uninsured. Most of their clients are probably unaware of that distinction, he said.

    Story Help (Click-ability)
    Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

    Comments

    Discussion Guidelines

    So what happens to Medicor now?

    jim nardone
    February 23, 2007 at 12:27 p.m.

    They(the McGhans')should be hung,drawn and quartered!

    Anne
    February 23, 2007 at 5:37 p.m.

    Why stop with the McGhans?

    anonymous
    February 24, 2007 at 5:31 p.m.

    For those who would like to take advantage of the benefits of a tax-deferred exchange, it is quite easy to avoid this kind of disaster. Seek a "qualified intermediary" that provides a written guarantee against such loss and then make sure you get a copy to review before you close a transaction. (An insurance policy or bond isn't always sufficient because it can lapse for a number of reasons, not the least of which is non-payment of premium.) Make sure that you, as the exchangor, are named in the guarantee and that it's time limit, if it has one, exceeds the 180-day (NOT 6 months) time period allowed by the IRS. A well-recognized National Title Insurance Company is usually your best bet.

    another anonymous
    February 25, 2007 at 11 a.m.

    Actually Another Anonymous 11:00 AM, you are better off with a guarantee by the bank that is holding the funds that the funds will be available to complete your exchange. There really is no better protection than that. Also be sure you are getting ALL the interest these funds earn. There is no good reason for the qualified intermediary to get any of that interest.

    anonymous
    February 26, 2007 at 2:25 p.m.

    Actually, anonymous, you're right. Getting a guarantee from a bank may work, but it isn't that simple. If the bank makes any tie of the funds to the exchangor, and just issuing an inadequately worded guarantee may do exactly that, there is constructive receipt of the proceeds by the exchangor and the exchange is blown, whereas a title company has a separate entity to act as a "qualified intermediary" holding the funds and the guarantee comes from the title company as a disinterested third party. Their guarantees have been very carefully worked out over time to avoid the constructive receipt aspect. If the bank has created such a guarantee, it could work. The title companies, however, have much more experience in this field and know how to avoid the pitfalls. Of course, as to the interest, the client is due a "growth factor" equal to all the interest earned. If you earn the "interest" directly, then it was your account, hence your funds and no tax-deferred exchange.

    another anonymous
    February 27, 2007 at 8:04 a.m.

    You must use an Accommodator which is a subsidiary of a national title company. If not, this can happen at any time. I can't imagine a company like First American closing. They have been in California for over 100 years. I use First American Exchange out of Las Vegas and I know my funds are safe there.

    anonymous
    March 1, 2007 at 9:27 a.m.

    For those that "lost" money with any of these three exchange company's, look for the deep pockets. In this case, the financial institutions that violated the Patriot Act by not reporting or allowing the movement of the money to ill-advised investments. This instition is primarily UBS, and secondarily, Silver State Bank.

    Very Anonymous but accurate!
    March 1, 2007 at 2:36 p.m.

    EVENT CALENDAR

    Previous Month | Next Month

    Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

    Local Weather

    Currently:
    Clear Sky
    Temperature:
    62.1°
    Wind:
    7 ESE

    Surf Report
    • Specials
    • InPrint
    • Top Emails
    • Best Of 2009
    • 2009 Election Coverage
    • Wedding Guide 2009
    • Blue Green Guide 2009
    • SBIFF 2009
    • Tea Fire 2008
    • Local Heroes 2008
    • Calendar of Fundraisers
    • Local Bands
    • High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    • CAMA Presents the Shanghai Symphony
    • Elings Park Expansion Shot Down
    • Before I Be Your Dog …
    • Flobots Return with New Record, New Vision
    • Autism Attacked Alternatively
    1. Eating Animals
    2. Montecito Pet Shop to Sell Only Rescued Dogs
    3. Producer Must Pay Landscaper
    4. Nothing to Hide Anymore
    5. High Noon in the Garden of Controversy
    6. Teacher in Trouble
    • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
    • LOG.IN
    • CONTENTS
    • CLASSIFIEDS
    • ARCHIVE
    • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
    Google
     
    Independent.com Web
    Copyright ©2009 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
    This is our Privacy Policy.