• CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US

  • Home
  • News
    • Business
    • NewsFlash
  • A&E
    • Movie Times
    • TV Listings
    • A&E Blog
    • Art Galleries
    • Best Bets
  • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Voices
    • Letters
    • In Memoriam
  • Events
    • Today
    • Search
    • Submit
    • Best Bets
  • Living
    • Travel
    • Sports
    • Peeps
  • Food & Drink
    • All Restaurants
    • Delivery
    • All Bars & Clubs
    • Drink Specials
    • Open Now
  • Outdoors
    • Outside Insider
    • Spotlight On
    • Features
  • Classifieds
    • Real Estate
    • Jobs
    • Autos
  • Personals
  • Obits

Smoochin’ the Pooch


Thursday, December 20, 2007
By Nick Welsh (Contact)
Article Tools
Print friendly
E-mail story
Tip Us Off
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
del.icio.us. del.icio.us.
Digg! Digg!
furl furl
google google
newsvine newsvine
reddit reddit
technorati technorati
Facebook Facebook
Yahoo! My Web 2.0 Yahoo!

A CONCEITED PROPOSAL: If audacious times call for audacious measures, then I’m sorry to report that no one in City Hall is willing to put their money where my mouth is. After watching the Santa Barbara City Council deliberate two weeks ago over a new ordinance to regulate the how, where, and when of medical marijuana dispensaries, I was struck more by what wasn’t said than by what was. It was a conspicuous case of the dog that didn’t bark, the other shoe that never dropped. No one ever discussed how City Hall could and should craft the ordinance to ensure that Santa Barbara gets a serious piece of the medical marijuana action. Sure, it’s nice to keep dispensaries away from schools, parks, hospitals, daycare centers, and flamenco dance studios, but can’t we expand the conversation in a remunerative fashion? To steal a line from Duke Ellington, it don’t mean a thing if ain’t got that ka-ching. I’m not being greedy here, folks. Just practical.

Angry Poodle Barbecue

Let’s look at the facts. First, there’s the issue of need. If we don’t need the money today, we absolutely will tomorrow. That’s because the bean counters in Sacramento are now projecting a $14.5 billion budget shortfall for the state government. When they get through swinging their machetes in the State House, you can be sure Santa Barbara will have been hacked, gouged, mutilated, and spindled in the process. In addition, Measure D — which for nearly 20 years has provided beaucoup bucks for expensive road repairs and transportation improvements — expires in two years. Given that Measure D needs a two-thirds majority to be renewed, its continued existence should be regarded as very much a long shot. And if it fails at the ballot box next November, that’s a whole lot of dough Santa Barbara won’t be getting anymore. Likewise, legal challenges are looming that could put aspects of the city’s lucrative Utility Users Tax in peril. Should these challenges materialize — and local governments across the state are assuming that they will — City Hall could be out $4 million a year. Even by Santa Barbara standards, that ain’t chicken feed. The traditional way local governments increase revenues is to approve new car dealerships or the construction of new mega malls. But we’ve already done both.

Santa Barbara clearly needs new revenue streams, and medical marijuana dispensaries — for all their legally required nonprofit status — are streaming with revenues. According to an area pot doc I consulted with, there are roughly 3,000 patients who’ve been prescribed medical marijuana living in and around Santa Barbara. Pot sells at about $400 an ounce, so you can do the math. For those without a pocket calculator, NORML (the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws) pointed out that the Compassion Center in Alameda County — recently shut down by the feds — generated $350,000 a year in sales taxes, and one in Bakersfield cranked out $427,000. NORML estimates California’s statewide pot crop — which includes both medical and recreational applications — could be worth as much as $2 billion a year. I’m guessing that number is conservative. Earlier this year, Sheriff’s deputies discovered no less than $500 million worth of plants on the property of my editor, Marianne Partridge, whose family owns a ranch outside Lompoc. In this case, guerilla growers associated with a Mexican drug cartel squatted on some of the exceptionally hard-to-reach portions of her property and created a massive pot plantation. Why should ganja gangsters make all the money?

Until this summer, Santa Barbara appeared to be one of the fastest growing medicinal marijuana markets in the state. In the past two years, we went from having two dispensaries to 13. And seven more were on the drawing board. And why not? Santa Barbara has long been home to the newly wed and the nearly dead, and those in the latter category have increasingly sought to create comfortable exit strategies by ingesting marijuana in one form or another.

There are some serious problems, however. Even though state voters resoundingly approved medical marijuana dispensaries 11 years ago, the federal government still maintains they’re against the law. Out of this disagreement, we have a cognitive dissonance that comes with considerable legal peril. The feds have shut down many operations throughout the state and put more than a few operators in the slammer. This past summer, the Drug Enforcement Administration sent out nasty letters to the landlords of Santa Barbara’s dispensaries threatening to seize their assets or put them in jail — or both — if they did not cease and desist immediately. The letters packed major pucker power, and at last count, only five dispensaries are left. My suggestion is City Hall fly in the face of the federal whirlwind by requiring the dispensaries to locate on city-owned properties. That way, they can exact an actual percentage of sales as part of the lease agreement, ensuring that the dispensaries are run in a clean and wholesome manner. During a recent conversation, Councilmember Das Williams rejected this proposal as “insane.” He then added, “But I mean that in the sweetest way possible.” While I appreciate the sweetness, I’d prefer a little daring.

This Tuesday, City Hall passed another anti-war resolution, calling on the United States to withdraw from Iraq during the next year. As much as I like the resolution, it was totally symbolic. Or as Councilmember Brian Barnwell described it, “a popcorn fart in a windstorm.” While we’re at it, why not take a more meaningful stand against the war on drugs, which costs the American public about $70 billion a year with nothing to show for it but about 1.5 million people behind bars. Of those, about half were popped for violating pot laws. If the Iraq War has cost the citizens of Santa Barbara $156 million, then the war on drugs has cost infinitely more. And that doesn’t even begin to consider the colossal waste of life and talent these laws have inflicted.

It’s easy for the council to be brave when making symbolic statements. But our bravery would count for more if our asses were on the line. Sure there are risks involved if City Hall rents space to dispensaries. But without risk, there is no payoff. And in this case, the payoffs could be huge. Think about it.

Story Help (Click-ability)
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.

Comments

Discussion Guidelines

I resolve that the next Resolution should be:

We, the employees, of Santa Babylon hereby resolve to change the State motto from "Eureka" to:

"Budgets? Budgets? We dont need no stinkin' budgets!"

Meanwhile, our local budget problems can be fixed by changing all speed limits in the county to 15mph.

All traffic fines will be disbursed equally to all residents thus obviating the need for developer and county subsidised "affordable housing". Not to mention the rush of "For Sale" signs which will add to the existing supply.

This will also allow us to forgo Measure D fund taxes as the 101 will be plenty wide enough to accomodate the dramatic drop in visitors.

Also "Studies" have shown that slower speeds reduce wear on the roads. In fact, motorist will also be able to reach out and pick weed for us on the side of the "High"way.

Additionally, in light of yesterdays tragic accident, all left turns will be made illegal.

sa1 (anonymous profile)
December 20, 2007 at 2:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)

From a financial point of view, what WOULD the profit margin be if our law enforcement actually enforced traffic laws around this area? In other words, if more traffic cops were hired, (and there is an endless supply of speeders and tailgaters in S.B.) would the revenue from enforcement exceed the money spent for enforcement? It seems to me (and I could very well be wrong) that busting these people would gain the city/county/state a lot of money but apparently people would rather just talk about it.

Even if we upped the speed limit in residential areas to 35 MPH and the freeway speed to 75 MPH a fortune still could be made on busting speeders.

billclausen (anonymous profile)
December 23, 2007 at 3:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Amen, keep on these guys and keep up posted when events like this happen!

Does anyone on the city counsel have any guts to make a call on this topic? Someone has to make a call, and then go with it otherwise we'll continue to get tramped by the feds at their whim.

bronc (anonymous profile)
December 26, 2007 at 12:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)

let me try to absorb all of this;
unthinkable crimes, in Santa Barbara, REGULARLY?
AND ...you passed up on "WENDY BITES DOG"...?
(how could you!)
and with all that is there in TOWN......YOU are writting about ASH?
(sp?)
and last....due to the INDICTMENTS in O.C., I am now trying to re-enter the real world, so...HAS ANYBODY GOT ANY CHANGE?
as in change for the better.....I always PRAY for all of you, even furillo, and if I had not run into Ms. WORSE COP, things would be better, but i can't really complain...any way...Hi DEB, (did she ever stop being 'red faced?)..and hello, Dayna, and yes, i was told she is still "REDS"........and what about THIS BLUE LINE THING..? that doesn't sound too good..........so be well, miss you who were so nice, others not so much, but when I get a regular job again, I will vacation there......since I will be getting paid in EUROs...alway with you in my HEART, Thom B.

tombarney (anonymous profile)
December 26, 2007 at 4:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)

What a joke. Do you realize doctors are prescribing pot for alcoholics to cope with their addictions? I guess if the doctor says its ok, than peeing in a cup for the judge doesn't count anymore.

jessica_jones (anonymous profile)
December 30, 2007 at 8:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Our current national drug policy has as it's principal beneficiary drug lords who make obscene profits due to the legal restrictions on their product. Next in line is the prison guards union which thrives on all the prisoners who have committed what are essentially victimless crimes (well not all but many). Finally CAMP and all the law enforcement personnel who should be spending their time and talent stopping serious crime not wasting it busting some doofus smoking a joint in public or private! Meanwhile alcohol, a far more dangeous drug, is legal and fat in our diet definitely kills more people than pot ever did or will.

Noletaman (anonymous profile)
January 3, 2008 at 1:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Haven't you heard people, there a War on Drugs still going on! Maybe, a good "surge" would make a difference--call out the National Guard, and have these "dispensaries" shut down!

Oh yeah, while I'm waiting, would someone please get me a drink, I need something to wash the Vicodin down? And, I might need a Paxil to calm my nerves, a Viagra to get me up (a cigarette afterwards), and some Lunestra or Rozerem to help me sleep! Then I'll need some ropinirole for my RLS. . . .

Ask your doctor, take a pill, Trim-Spa, baby!

equus_posteriori (anonymous profile)
January 4, 2008 at 9:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Post a comment

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

EVENT CALENDAR

Previous Month | Next Month

Today's Events Best Bets Submit an Event

Local Weather

Currently:
Mist
Temperature:
59.0°
Wind:
5 SSE

Surf Report
  • Specials
  • InPrint
  • Top Emails
  • Blue Green Guide 2008
  • Summer Camp Guide 2008
  • Wedding Guide 2008
  • SBIFF 2008 All Access
  • 2008 Election Info
  • Best of Reader's Poll 2007
  • Calendar of Fundraisers
  • Local Bands
  • Kid's Mother's Day Issue
  • Made in Santa Barbara
  • Zaca Fire 2007
  • UCSB Students Connect with Veterans and Others Touched by the Horrors of War
  • Cory Cordero-Rabe’s Sound Lab Brings a Community - Based Studio to S.B.
  • Goleta Tax Won’t Endanger Measure A
  • Let the Dog Days Begin
  • New Hires and New Roles at SBMA, the Arts Fund, Westmont, and UCSB
  • Brooks Institute’s Mariah Tauger Is Taking Her Camera to Beijing
  1. Early Morning Gap Fire Update
  2. Gap Fire Reaches Critical Stage
  3. Gap Fire Morning Outlook
  4. Gap Fire Intensifies
  5. Gap Fire Map Online
  6. Update From Friday Afternoon Gap Fire Press Conference
  • CREATE AN ACCOUNT
  • LOG.IN
  • CONTENTS
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • ARCHIVE
  • INFO | ADVERTISING | CONTACT US
Google
 
Independent.com Web
Copyright ©2008 Santa Barbara Independent, Inc. Reproduction of material from any Independent.com pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. If you believe an Independent.com user or any material appearing on Independent.com is copyrighted material used without proper permission, please click here.
This is our Privacy Policy.