When the six walked out, it was bad.
When the rallies, town meetings, and signs sprouted like mushrooms – that too was bad.
Every resignation, and the attendant publicity – also not good.
An editorial staff so pissed and demoralized that they would turn to a union to solve their problems … very bad.
A successful union vote; very, very bad.
But now Ms. McCaw is in some real deep doo-doo.
Employees Sue Santa Barbara Paper
From the Associated Press October 12, 2006
SANTA BARBARA — About 200 past and current employees of the embattled Santa Barbara News-Press sued the paper Wednesday, contending that it failed to keep accurate time records and stiffed them out of overtime pay.
The suit alleges that the newspaper failed to pay overtime to employees who worked more than eight hours a day or more than 40 hours a week. It also alleges that the News-Press did not provide its employees with meal and rest periods that are required by California law.
"It is common for employers to unintentionally violate" technical portions of the state's employment laws, said plaintiffs' attorney Bruce Anticouni, who filed the lawsuit in Santa Barbara County Superior Court. "However, in my opinion, the alleged News-Press violations appear to have been willful, which would allow for the award of penalties to the affected employees."
(snip)
This is one battle that cannot be won.
Wage and hour claims are an uphill battle for employers, who are considered guilty until they prove innocence. The laws strongly favor employees (as they should), and a defense must be flawless to be successful. Wage and hour claims are the modern day version of “whiplash.”
And the classification of employees as “managers” to avoid overtime is a common, and usually unlawful, practice in our industry. Prediction: Defending De La Guerra opens an artery of Benjamins significant even to a flush benefactress of community property laws, which will lead to serious consideration of a fire sale, only to be denied in a fit of pride. The winners; the employees. The biggest winner; the Mountie of Santa Barbara employment law, Bruce Anticouni.
Clarification: As mentioned by astute reader "not quite," Mr. Anticouni is only representing Hildy Medina and is seeking class status for the alleged violations of California Labor laws. From the followup AP article:
The lawsuit, filed on behalf of former reporter Hildy Medina, seeks class-action status for as many as 200 past and present employees.
I spoke with Anticouni this afternoon, and he suggested other New-Press employees from outside the newsroom would also be joining in the action.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
If anyone should know the problems and final legal result of a newspaper not paying months or years of proper overtime to its employees, the Independent should.
Indy Insider
October 16, 2006 at 8:22 a.m.
The S.B. Newspress has no journalistic integrity.
db
October 16, 2006 at 11 a.m.
IMPORTANT DISTINCTION ALERT:
This story was quickly followed by another AP release, which recast the lede.
In fact, only ONE reporter, ex-SBNPer Hildy Medina, has sued. She and her lawyer are SEEKING class action status, essentially inviting the others to participate.
This suit does not come from the organized newsroom staff, which has its own attorney.
not quite
October 16, 2006 at 6:57 p.m.
CraigSmithBlog.com reports today that the audit of the Newspress circulation probably will include lots of counts for newspapers that are given away, even if the recipient does not want them. The rules of ABC maybe slushy on that, as Smith writes and links to a 2004 article in Slate, but counting an uninvited newspaper delivery as a circulation hit seems like plain fraud to me.
Will this become more public perciption and legal problems for the Newspress travails and dysfunction as well?
Craig Smith Fan
October 17, 2006 at 2:28 a.m.
I agree that the only real winners here will be the lawyers in the benefit of reaping huge legal fees. And even they can hide only so much of McCaw's failures and fuzzy math problems.
Dian Davis
October 17, 2006 at 8:33 a.m.
“That’s a stretch, Armstrong”
From, I’m not one to blog, but…
http://imnotonetoblogbut.blogspot.com/20...
More of it...
October 17, 2006 at 8:44 a.m.
Post a comment