Former N-P Editor Fires Back at Wendy McCaw
Wendy McCaw, owner of the Santa Barbara News-Press, used her lawsuit against an American Journalism Review writer to “publicly attack and defame” former editor Jerry Roberts (pictured receiving the Society of Professional Journalists ethics award), his attorney contends.

McCaw’s recent suit in an Orange County court against Susan Paterno (download that here in PDF form), author of the recent “Santa Barbara Smackdown” piece in the AJR, accuses Paterno of defamation regarding the News-Press and “trade libel.” But it was also a “calculated end-run” around current arbitration proceedings to trash Roberts' reputation, San Francisco attorney Andrine K. Smith told The Independent on Wednesday.
Roberts, former managing editor of the San Francisco Chronicle, resigned from the News-Press in early July amid staff complaints that McCaw was interfering with news coverage. Since then, about 30 newsroom staffers have left, including this writer, and several were fired during the resulting unionization effort.
McCaw (pictured) then filed a $500,000 claim against Roberts now
under arbitration proceedings, which are supposed to be kept
confidential.
But McCaw’s suit “is not just about
Susan Paterno or the AJR story," said Roberts' attorney.
"We believe it is just as much about Jerry Roberts.” It is “a
calculated end-run around the confidentiality protections of the
arbitration proceedings filed by (McCaw) against Mr. Roberts and
provides the means for Ms. McCaw to publicly attack and defame Mr.
Roberts with impunity under the absolute protection of the
litigation privilege.” Under California law, anything said in a
lawsuit or litigation, no matter how defamatory, cannot be used in
a libel suit against the person making the statements.
“We concur with the numerous other commentators that the suit is but the latest attempt by Ms. McCaw to intimidate and silence those who speak out against her, or who report on those who speak out against her, and is intended to have a chilling effect on anyone who might consider doing so in the future,” Smith said. (For more details on what might happen to anyone trying to "have a chilling effect" on public participation, see the California Anti-SLAPP Project at casp.net.)
McCaw’s suit claimed that the AJR piece was “nothing but a biased, false, and misleading diatribe” against the News-Press. It was “one-sided” and “false and defamatory,” the suit alleged. In addition to lobbing critical barbs at Roberts, the suit included a claim that he “became verbally abusive” with McCaw, leading her to stop speaking to him, apparently for the last two years of his tenure. Her suit exposed much dirty laundry about mounting newsroom tensions since she bought the paper in 2000.
AJR editor Rem Rieder defended
Paterno’s account, which cited many issues related to the upheaval
at the paper since early July.
“This story is carefully reported, carefully
fact-checked,” Rieder said in a December 19 story in Editor &
Publisher. “Suing the writer like this is just a form of
intimidation,” he said. “It is particularly unfortunate to see
something like this from someone who owns a newspaper. You’d think
someone who owns a newspaper would be committed to free
expression.”
Although McCaw sued writer Paterno as an individual and not AJR, Rieder said the paper would provide legal support for Paterno, who is director of the journalism program at Chapman University in Orange, California. AJR is published by the University of Maryland.
Double-clicking on any word or phrase in this story will open a reference window with definitions and links to other reference material.
Print friendly
E-mail story
Contact an Editor
iPod friendly
Comments
Bookmark This
Previous Month


Comments
Discussion Guidelines
My goodness, the contents of a lawsuit have absolute protection from libel? So a person can sue someone and slip in loosely related claims that they supply heroin to children, beat their spouse, and have naked parties with toddlers?
Well, what is surprising is that News-Press staffers haven't used this loophole to leak out all sorts of info in evasion of the News-Press gag orders. Seems to me their team of pro-bono lawyers could help them do so.
Have lawyers made this a great country or what.
moteofdust
December 20, 2006 at 10:02 p.m.
Mote, there are limits to the privilege, but they are narrow. If for example, a litigant attached some defamatory document to a filing that had nothing to do with the case, that might not be shielded, and might also be considered an "abuse of process" subject to legal sanction.
Control Freak
December 20, 2006 at 10:49 p.m.
Litigation happy. There is a pretty funny poll, which included McCaw on Santa Barbara's Blog:
http://www.santabarbarasblog.com
She does need to sell the paper, keep the building, and open up a law office.
goleta jackson
December 21, 2006 at 3:02 p.m.
This woman is a fat slob and i will take her boyfriend away from her.
Spendy McFlaw
December 21, 2006 at 9:48 p.m.
I deplore the unfortunate ownership of the News-Press by Ms. McCaw. Anything "defamatory" posted about her has been _well_ earned by McCaw herself. How could anybody make up the bizarre temper tantrums this woman hires lawyers to perpetrate? Please, someone with money... The poor paper needs a "hostile" buyout!
ML Wilser
December 22, 2006 at 7:33 a.m.
ML, "hostile buyout" doesn't apply to a privately held company like Ampersand.
hatred, contempt, and ridicule for Wendy
December 22, 2006 at 9:12 a.m.
Santa Barbara has always been a playground for the wealthy; but most have had the good sense not to meddle with its institutions - such a shame to see the New Press turned into a malevolent tool
Former Resident
December 26, 2006 at 3:23 p.m.
Post a comment